University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi

Side-by-side comparison from 90 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB: wins 0/1 categories
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC: wins 0/1 categories
Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS: wins 0/1 categories
Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty: wins 1/1 categories
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi: wins 0/1 categories
Faculty of Computer Science - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi: wins 0/1 categories
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi - TUIASI: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Maths
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.34
3.88
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Location
4.20
4.21
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Professors
3.59
3.99
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.00
Internationality
3.51
3.58
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Student life
3.94
4.27
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Value
3.72
4.09
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
5.00
4.50
Accommodation
3.15
3.97
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
  • +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
  • +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Valuable practical experiences and learning opportunities
  • +Affordable living costs and good facilities

Nothing to show

  • +Strong technical training and faculty advantages

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and faculty
  • +Positive and pleasant study experience
  • +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Interactive and interesting courses
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and poor future preparation.
  • -Arrogant academic staff and poor student treatment.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause frustration for students.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as rigid and not aligned with industry needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.

This university garners particularly strong ratings in **Student Life** and **Location**, both exceeding 4.2. **Value** and **Accomodation** also score highly, around 4.0. In contrast, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.58, while **Facilities** also falls slightly below other metrics at 3.88. Professors are generally well-regarded, nearing a 4.0 average.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.

Nothing to show

This institution excels, securing perfect scores in **Professors, Location, Student Life, Internationality, and Value**. Accommodations and Facilities also received strong marks at 4 out of 5. Overall, the university demonstrates a consistently high-quality experience, with its strongest aspects lying in its academic staff, vibrant campus, and affordability. Its weakest areas, though still highly rated, are its physical infrastructure and housing options.

This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.

With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 19 reviews, approximately 74% are positive, highlighting good facilities and involved teachers. A small portion (~5.3%) experienced disappointment with teaching methods and arrogant staff.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback highlights great professors in the Faculty of Computer Science who support students. There is no negative feedback to report.

Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.

Rating distribution
5★
24%
37%
0%
100%
0%
100%
50%
4★
40%
37%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
30%
21%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
6%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My professors

My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close