University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi
Side-by-side comparison from 94 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Involved and supportive professors.
- +Good job prospects post-graduation.
- +Affordable living costs and useful facilities.
Nothing to show
- +Strong technical training and faculty advantages
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors and faculty
- +Positive learning environment
- +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Interactive and interesting courses
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Poor student treatment and arrogant staff.
- -Outdated teaching methods and lack of future preparedness.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
- -Disorganized curriculum and teaching quality are criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This institution excels in student life and location, with ratings of 4.38 and 4.28 respectively. Professors also received strong marks. Conversely, internationality is the weakest area, scoring 3.59, though facilities at 3.85 and accommodation at 3.98 are also moderate. Value for money is rated well at over 4.0.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also seem satisfied with **professors**, **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **facilities**, which are rated at 3.
This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
With an average rating of 4.09/5 from 22 reviews, ~77% praise involved professors and good job prospects. A small amount of negative feedback (~4.6%) cited obsolete teaching methods and arrogant staff.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted great professors and a pleasant study experience, particularly in the Faculty of Computer Science. No negative feedback was recorded.
Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
