University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs University of Craiova vs Spiru Haret University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 88 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Helpful and dedicated professors
- +Valuable student opportunities and international programs
- +Well-structured and understandable curriculum
- +Flexible distance learning and accessible study resources
- +Good teachers and interactive courses
- +Convenient location and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
- +Dedicated and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic foundation with practical application
- +Well-equipped facilities for hands-on learning
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -administrative and management issues
- -outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -lack of clarity in course structure and grading
- -Ineffective communication and poor administrative support from the school.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources for learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum content.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from faculty are prevalent concerns.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its Location, receiving the highest rating. Professors also perform exceptionally well. Conversely, the Facilities received the lowest rating, indicating an area for potential improvement. Student Life and Accomodation also fall within a moderate range, while Internationality and Value present further opportunities for growth.
This institution receives a commendable average rating, with its **Location** being its strongest asset at 4.2. **Professors** also scored highly at 4.0. Conversely, **Internationality** presented the weakest area with a rating of 3.2. Other aspects like Facilities, Value, and Accommodation fall within a similar mid-range, with Student Life also slightly lower.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in Professors (5), Accomodation (4.67), and Value (4.67). Internationality and Location also score highly at 4.33. Student Life is well-regarded at 4. The primary area for improvement appears to be Facilities, which received the lowest rating at 3.67.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
Positive feedback (~100%) highlights empathetic professors and detailed, flexible courses. Students also appreciate the opportunities offered, despite some facilities being older.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~80%). Students highlight accessible distance learning and flexible scheduling. Some note decent academic quality and good teachers, though it's not considered the absolute best.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
With 100% positive sentiment, reviews highlight great teachers, knowledgeable professors, and excellent academic foundations. Students appreciate strong theoretical and practical courses, well-equipped facilities, and modern resources for skill development.
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Nothing to show
Available teachers for all course issues. Location near your home town. Courses take place according to the curriculum. The classes are interactive and complex. With some of my colleagues, we still keep in touch and we are very close.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
