Goldsmiths University of London - Gold vs University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign vs Nnamdi Azikiwe University Teaching Hospital - SHIMNAUTH vs Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University - ЧНУ ChNU vs Mahasaraswati Denpasar University
Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Intellectually stimulating programmes with an interdisciplinary approach.
- +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable lecturers.
- +Encouragement of critical thinking, independent learning, and creative problem-solving.
- +Excellent, caring professors and strong STEM/engineering programs
- +Abundant social life, campus activities, and student organizations
- +Practical, flexible learning opportunities and undergraduate research
- +Self-directed learning opportunities
- +Strict but effective instructors
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized administration and teaching with frequent strikes.
- -Biased teaching lacking diverse perspectives.
- -Unfair grading and lack of timely feedback.
- -Toxic academic environment and abusive faculty behavior.
- -Pervasive issues with racism and sexism.
- -Insufficient support and inability of good staff to enact change.
- -Lack of a functional website and poor digital infrastructure.
- -Difficulty with administrative processes and communication with school staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With exceptional ratings in Internationality and Professors, this university demonstrates significant strengths in its global outlook and faculty expertise. Its facilities and location also received favorable scores. However, accommodation appears to be the area with the lowest student satisfaction. Student life and value for money are also rated moderately well, suggesting a generally positive, though not perfect, experience.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.63) and **Professors** (4.52). **Value** (4.57) and **Accomodation** (4.29) also received strong scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.42) stands out as the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed aspects.
This university demonstrates a mixed performance across key areas. It excels in **Student Life** and **Value**, both receiving a strong 3.5 and 3.67 respectively. **Location** also scores well at 3.5. However, significant weaknesses are apparent in **Accomodation**, with a low rating of 1.5, and **Internationality**, at 1.67. **Professors** also received a comparatively lower score of 2.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nearly 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting intellectually stimulating programmes, supportive and knowledgeable lecturers, and a creative learning environment. A small amount of negative feedback notes disorganized departments and occasional strikes.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~95%), with students praising excellent professors and abundant social and research opportunities. A small minority (~5%) cited issues within specific departments.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is mixed. Positive comments praise self-teaching opportunities and strict lecturers, while negative reviews (around 33.3%) highlight a lack of online resources and poor digital infrastructure.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
