Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR vs Technical University of Moldova - UTM vs Champlain College vs Open University of Cyprus vs Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology

Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad de Puerto Rico - UPR: wins 0/0 categories
Technical University of Moldova - UTM: wins 0/0 categories
Champlain College: wins 0/0 categories
Open University of Cyprus: wins 0/0 categories
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology: wins 0/0 categories
University of Puerto Rico Rio Piedras: wins 0/0 categories
Aklan State University - ASU: wins 0/0 categories
Comparing
Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico
4.60
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Computer Science
Burlington, Vermont, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Elementary Education
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.75
4.00
5.00
4.50
3.50
5.00
Location
4.88
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
5.00
Professors
4.56
4.00
5.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
5.00
Internationality
4.22
2.75
4.50
5.00
4.00
4.00
5.00
Student life
4.44
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.50
5.00
5.00
Value
4.44
3.75
4.50
5.00
4.50
4.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.33
3.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
3.50
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse, high-quality academic programs and career opportunities
  • +Supportive faculty and a strong sense of community and personal growth
  • +Open, inclusive, and professional campus environment
  • +Quality education with knowledgeable and inspiring faculty
  • +Opportunities for extracurricular involvement and scientific activities
  • +Well-equipped facilities including advanced laboratories and gyms
  • +Excellent, relevant, and timely career preparation
  • +Supportive and accessible professors
  • +Strong, award-winning program content
  • +Flexible distance learning for work-life balance
  • +High-quality course materials and faculty support
  • +Accessible education for diverse students
  • +Strong academic programs and helpful teachers
  • +Excellent reputation for studies and placements
  • +Diverse course offerings in engineering and technology
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Well-prepared teaching staff and continuous training
  • +Excellent facilities and positive environment
  • +High-quality education
  • +Free tuition
  • +Strong student support
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum structure lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching methods.
  • -Poor teaching quality and outdated faculty.
  • -Limited options and external interference.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and unhelpful staff cause frustration.
  • -Limited course variety and a lack of engaging learning experiences are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact learning.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality leads to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as ineffective.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are common complaints.
  • -The academic curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as inadequate.
Rating summary
What students say

This academic institution garners praise across multiple facets, with exceptional marks for **location** (4.88) and **professors** (4.56). Student life and overall value also receive strong scores around 4.44. The weakest area identified is **facilities**, rated at 3.5. Other positive aspects include accommodations and internationality, both scoring above 4.2.

This university demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **location** and **student life**, both earning high marks of 4. Professors also received a strong rating of 4. Areas requiring improvement include accommodation, scoring 3, and its internationality, which received the lowest rating at 2.75. The university also offers a solid value proposition and good facilities.

Remarkably strong scores characterize this institution, particularly for its professors, location, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, scoring 4, while internationality and value stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. The university excels in core academic and living aspects, with no areas falling below a solid 4.

Remarkably, this institution achieves perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and accommodation, received a 5-star rating. The university excels equally in location, internationality, and value, indicating a consistently excellent experience for its students. No single area stands out as weaker; all facets demonstrate outstanding performance.

The institution garners excellent marks in most areas, with accommodation standing out at a perfect 5. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received a strong 4.5. Internationality is rated a solid 4, representing the only area below the highest tier. Overall, the university presents a highly positive picture with consistently high scores.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas, with perfect scores awarded for its professors, location, and student life. Internationality also receives a positive rating. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and accommodation, which are rated moderately well. Overall, the university offers strong value and excels in its academic and social offerings.

Universities evaluated demonstrate outstanding performance across the board. All surveyed areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, received perfect scores of 5. This indicates exceptional strengths in every aspect, with no discernable weaker areas. The institution appears to excel comprehensively.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.55/5. Students highlight excellent faculty, diverse programs, and a supportive environment for personal and professional growth. No negative feedback was reported.

~55% of reviews are positive, highlighting extracurriculars, good professors, and advanced labs. ~9% express dissatisfaction with teaching quality and faculty, noting limited alternatives. The average rating is 3.73/5.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the university's ability to prepare them for life and their careers, highlighting valuable professors and excellent program-specific knowledge.

The single review is overwhelmingly positive, praising the university's flexibility for distance learners and excellent course materials and faculty support. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight helpful teachers and strong academics.

With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 2 reviews, the university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students highlight supportive and knowledgeable professors, along with excellent facilities and a positive environment. No negative feedback was provided.

With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight high-quality, free education and exceptional student care. No negative feedback was recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
60%
27%
100%
100%
50%
50%
100%
4★
50%
27%
0%
0%
50%
50%
0%
3★
0%
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

University with old material

UTM teaches old materials in the IT field, every day this world is developing and UTM all but not so fast that the technologies that appear every day. There is too much material in the study program that takes a lot of time to study, and students fail to understand normally the field they are taught.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Related articles

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close