Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Université de Montréal vs Academy of Aeronautics vs Greystone College vs College CDI

Side-by-side comparison from 75 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: RUBIKA (4.40)
Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM: wins 0/7 categories
Université de Montréal: wins 0/7 categories
Academy of Aeronautics: wins 0/7 categories
Greystone College: wins 1/7 categories
College CDI: wins 0/7 categories
TAV College: wins 6/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Design
Best programme: Political Science
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Montreal, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
12 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Marketing
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Montreal, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Digital Marketing
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
3.70
4.29
Not rated
3.73
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.47
Location
4.45
4.15
Not rated
4.45
Not rated
5.00
Win
3.13
Professors
4.18
4.29
Not rated
4.33
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.27
Internationality
3.91
4.09
Not rated
4.42
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.87
Student life
4.20
4.06
Not rated
4.42
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.20
Value
4.00
4.11
Not rated
3.92
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.67
Accommodation
4.00
3.79
Not rated
3.27
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Helpful professors and supportive staff
  • +Strong marketing & business programs with useful real-world application
  • +Vibrant student life and integration support
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse and challenging coursework
  • +Hands-on learning and research opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Effective teaching and supportive professors
  • +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
  • +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation

Nothing to show

  • +Teaching excellence and faculty dedication
  • +Interactive and engaging learning environment
  • +Personalized attention and academic success
  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Lack of support and slow communication.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.

Nothing to show

  • -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
  • -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
  • -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

This university receives its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing also in Student Life and Value. Professors are rated well, as is Accomodation. Internationality and Facilities, while still solid, represent the areas with slightly lower scores in this assessment.

Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.

Nothing to show

This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance across most surveyed aspects. It received perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. The weakest area, while still positive, is Internationality, rated at a commendable 4. This suggests a highly desirable institution with outstanding offerings in nearly every dimension, with a slight opportunity for enhanced global engagement.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, useful and interesting programs, and a supportive student environment. One negative review cited a lack of support.

Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.

Nothing to show

Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.

Nothing to show

With a single review, this university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was entirely positive, highlighting teaching excellence and a dynamic learning environment.

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
34%
0%
33%
0%
0%
47%
4★
33%
60%
0%
42%
0%
100%
47%
3★
8%
6%
0%
17%
0%
0%
7%
2★
8%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Université du Québec à Montréal

After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

My Greystone college's experience

I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close