University of Siena - UNISI vs Istituto Marangoni vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs University for Foreigners of Siena – International University vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice

Side-by-side comparison from 178 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SHG Universities (5.00)
University of Siena - UNISI: wins 0/7 categories
Istituto Marangoni: wins 0/7 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/7 categories
University for Foreigners of Siena – International University: wins 0/7 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/7 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 3/7 categories
SHG Universities: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Language for Intercultural Communication
London, The United Kingdom
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: International Fashion Business
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Cultural Mediation
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Lisbon, Portugal
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: International Hospitality Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.81
3.33
3.92
3.20
3.77
4.71
Win
Not rated
Location
4.44
4.67
4.23
4.00
4.34
4.43
5.00
Win
Professors
4.39
4.33
4.14
3.80
4.01
4.71
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.04
4.67
4.22
4.00
4.11
4.43
5.00
Win
Student life
3.75
3.67
4.06
3.60
3.87
4.57
Win
4.00
Value
4.11
4.33
4.14
4.00
4.12
4.86
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.41
4.00
3.78
2.80
3.25
4.20
Win
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and academic environment
  • +Strong international focus and scholarships
  • +Excellent facilities and city integration
  • +Global fashion hub and career opportunities
  • +Inspiring teachers and valuable learning experiences
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Excellent, trained, and available faculty
  • +Diverse and relevant course offerings
  • +Opportunities for specialized learning
  • +High quality professors and intellectually stimulating environment
  • +International focus and diverse opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning and manageable workload
  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
  • +Practice-oriented approach and practical application of skills
  • +International perspective and understanding of the industry
  • +Teachers as current specialists
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Communication breakdowns and lack of transparency are significant problems.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
  • -Unclear communication and a lack of student support are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and organizational issues are a major complaint.
  • -Ineffective and disorganized course structure and content are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of responsiveness from professors and university staff is frustrating.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Students often complain about administrative inefficiency and poor communication.
  • -Course content is frequently perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong ratings, with Location and Professors being its standout strengths, both exceeding 4.4. Internationality and Value also score well, above 4.0. Conversely, Accomodation and Student Life present the weakest areas, falling below 3.8. Facilities score moderately, around 3.8. The university offers a well-rounded experience, though improvements could be focused on student housing and campus life.

This institution shines particularly brightly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving excellent scores. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out as strong points. Conversely, the **Facilities** represent the weakest area, scoring considerably lower than other aspects. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement but also solid performance.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This university performs exceptionally well in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores of 4. **Value** also matches this high standard. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8. Other aspects like **Professors** (3.8) and **Student Life** (3.6) are rated positively, while **Facilities** (3.2) is a moderate area.

The university shows a strong performance in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.34. Other positive aspects include **Internationality** and **Value**, both exceeding 4.0. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.25. **Professors** and **Student Life** also received solid scores, indicating a generally well-rounded educational experience.

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

With outstanding scores in several key areas, this institution shines in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving perfect marks. Student life is also highly regarded, scoring a 4. Accommodations are rated a 3, representing a moderate aspect. The university's weakest area by a significant margin is **Facilities**, which received a score of 0. Overall, the value proposition is excellent, also rated a 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

University of Siena receives overwhelmingly positive reviews (~100%) with an average rating of 4.37/5. Students praise the supportive environment, helpful professors, and valuable academic programs. No negative feedback was recorded.

With a 3.67 average rating, positive feedback (~33%) highlights fashion business opportunities and inspiring teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

Students are highly satisfied with the university's diverse and current language programs, as well as the highly competent and available faculty. The small class sizes foster strong student-teacher interaction.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting stimulating international environments, qualified faculty, and useful courses. A small percentage (~7%) mention issues with university organization, professor responsiveness, and course structure.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

With a single review, the university has a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights a strong professional stage, theoretical and practical understanding of the industry, and a practice-oriented approach with current specialists.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
33%
36%
40%
45%
86%
100%
4★
57%
0%
41%
40%
32%
14%
0%
3★
3%
67%
23%
20%
16%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
4%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Evaluating the University of Siena

Advantages -DSU Toscana provides you an accommodation and stipends. That is need based scholarship. Most low-income students are provided. -Siena has many professors who are highly ranked according to Google Scholar. -City is small and all campuses can be reached easily. -You have 6 chances to make your grades better for whole year. Disadvantages -City is labyrinth. -Courses are not well organised. There is only one accounting related course in MSc International Accounting and Management. -Most professors don't care about your thesis, process and writings. -During the lesson, professors use Italian words. That is unacceptable.

Educational content

I like a lot of it but I feel like the subject teaches us the same every time. There should be more diversity in our contents and make us work more in groups and do more exercises in class, in order words the classes should be more dynamic

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close