ESERP Business School vs EU Business School vs INSA Business, Marketing & Communication School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escola Superior de Relacions Públiques
Side-by-side comparison from 431 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical learning & real-world application
- +Strong marketing & business programmes
- +Supportive environment & professional development
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Supportive faculty and personal growth opportunities
- +Industry connections and career preparation
- +Friendly environment and family-like atmosphere
- +Personalized faculty support and professional development
- +Organized and clear program delivery with helpful staff
- +Excellent academic environment and modern facilities
- +High-quality teaching and personalized attention from instructors.
- +Excellent facilities fostering a comfortable and dynamic learning environment.
- +Relevant and engaging workshops offering practical experience.
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- -Poor management, organization, and academic support.
- -Outdated and low-quality facilities.
- -Deceptive marketing and unclear policies regarding student work.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Educational content and program delivery are frequently inadequate.
- -Promises made regarding job placement and accreditation are often unfulfilled.
- -Poor management and unprofessional leadership.
- -Incompetent teachers due to unqualified hiring practices.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
This university receives excellent marks for its **location**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Internationality** also stands out as a strength. Conversely, **student life** is identified as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. While **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** are all rated well, **accommodation** is considered average.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Offering a compelling student experience, this institution excels in its **Internationality**, scoring a remarkable 4.5. Professors and location also received high marks at 4.0. However, areas for improvement include **Facilities**, rated at 3.17, and **Value** at 3.0, indicating these aspects are less strong compared to others. Student life and accommodation are moderately rated.
This institution receives commendations across several key areas. Accommodation stands out as its strongest point, boasting the highest rating. Other well-regarded aspects include facilities and professors, both scoring an impressive 4.25. While student life, internationality, and value are also positively rated, the location is the weakest area of assessment, though still considered good.
Achieving perfect scores in six out of seven surveyed categories, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and internationality. Its strongest areas reflect an outstanding overall student experience. Conversely, the university's value proposition received a lower rating of 3, suggesting a potential area for improvement or further examination in terms of cost-effectiveness relative to its offerings.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting useful knowledge and good courses. A smaller portion (~8.3%) mentions poor organization and low-quality facilities.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting growth, supportive faculty, and career preparation through industry connections. Negative feedback, about 29% of reviews, mentions frustrations with administrative issues and some curriculum concerns.
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 9 reviews, ~78% of feedback is positive. Students praise personalized professor attention, organization, and support. A small amount of negative feedback noted director and faculty issues.
With 100% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.5/5, student reviews highlight excellent teaching, personalized attention from professors, and effective workshops. Facilities are also praised for comfort.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
I have completed my Marketing Degree at ESERP x Staffordshire program. It was useful, close to reality. The majority of professors were professional, except one who was constantly late for classes like 1 hour. After I complained about it, the situation got better, although my anonymity was not kept as it was promised, so do not believe that you can make anonymous complains - everything will be revealed.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
I applied for a Master in English as the master coordinator promised me it is available. On my first day I found out they only had it in Spanish, so I moved from Germany to Spain for a Master where I couldn't understand anything and of course, it was already very late to apply for another University or Business School. I wrote a Mail to the coordinator as the people in the front office couldn't help me, but I didn't get an answer. As well I tried to call but you only have the number of the front office and they always told me the coordinator is busy or when they told me he will call me back I didn't get a call. After a while, I got the Information that I will get my money back but I had to fill in a form. Of course, I didn't get the form in the time period the coordinator promised me and I had to try to call again. Same as last time I had no chance to speak with him. At the end, I contacted a lawyer and wrote a last mail to the coordinator. He replied 10 minutes later...! I can not recommend this business school!! Even I had the chance to visit two different classes for one session and the lecturer explained very practical which was good but very very slow. You also have to take care because you won't get a Master of Science or Art or anything accepted in der European Region.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
