University of Sunderland vs University of British Columbia vs McMaster University vs Fleming College vs General Assembly

Side-by-side comparison from 345 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: General Assembly (5.00)
University of Sunderland: wins 1/7 categories
University of British Columbia: wins 0/7 categories
McMaster University: wins 2/7 categories
Fleming College: wins 0/7 categories
General Assembly: wins 4/7 categories
Lighthouse Labs: wins 0/7 categories
Masters College and Seminary - MCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Sunderland, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Best programme: Arts
Hamilton, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
83 reviews
×
Best programme: Life Science
Peterborough, Canada
4.00
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Security and Investigations
New York City, United States
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing
Vancouver, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.52
4.21
4.22
3.55
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.15
4.46
4.12
3.64
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.44
Win
4.10
4.22
3.55
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.24
4.34
4.48
Win
4.18
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.07
4.31
4.16
3.40
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.16
4.08
4.39
Win
3.64
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.75
3.85
4.10
3.18
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
  • +Challenging academics and rewarding workload
  • +Excellent faculty and practical learning opportunities
  • +Vibrant campus, abundant resources, and supportive environment
  • +Supportive and passionate professors
  • +Welcoming and diverse community with many involvement opportunities
  • +Excellent resources for career planning and development
  • +Relevant curriculum and practical skills development
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Flexible learning options and engaging campus events
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
  • +Abundant study resources and learning activities
  • +Networking opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
  • -Difficulty with course selection and academic support in large classes.
  • -Inconsistent professor quality and arbitrary grading practices.
  • -Challenges finding genuine connections and disappointing social scene outside of clubs.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of clarity and support in coursework and academic guidance.
  • -Outdated facilities and obsolete curriculum are significant concerns.
  • -Incompetent instructors and a lack of industry-relevant knowledge acquisition are major drawbacks.
  • -The college's reputation and value in the job market have significantly declined.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.

Evaluations reveal a university excelling in several key aspects. The location garners the highest score, followed closely by internationality and student life, indicating a vibrant and globally connected environment. Professors and value also receive positive, albeit slightly lower, ratings. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, suggesting room for improvement in student housing options. Facilities, while solid, are not a standout feature compared to other categories.

With exceptional ratings in several categories, this university shines particularly brightly in **Internationality**, scoring a high 4.48. **Facilities** and **Professors** also received strong marks at 4.22. **Value** is another notable strength, with a rating of 4.39. The **Accomodation** area received the lowest, though still positive, rating of 4.10. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded offering with a clear international focus.

This institution garners excellent marks for its international environment, standing out with a high rating for Internationality. The university also scores well in Location and Value. Conversely, Accomodation is its lowest-rated aspect. Facilities and Professors receive similar, moderate scores, while Student Life falls slightly below average.

Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.

Over 86% of reviews praise demanding yet rewarding academics, great study spaces, and excellent resources. A small minority (~1%) mentions course selection difficulties and the struggle to connect with people.

With 83 reviews, ~74% are positive, highlighting supportive and knowledgeable professors, a vibrant and diverse community with many clubs, and a welcoming campus. No negative feedback was recorded.

The college receives strong positive feedback (~74%) for its well-structured curriculum, relevant skills development, and dedicated staff. Some criticism (~18%) points to program quality and instructor consistency.

With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
38%
53%
64%
100%
0%
0%
4★
43%
50%
36%
9%
0%
0%
0%
3★
14%
12%
11%
9%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
18%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Underwhelming

I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.

Combined Honors in Economics and Mathematics

Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.

Fleming collage in Peterborough

Hello everyone, I was enrolled at Fleming College in Peterborough, and I strongly recommend choosing another option. The professors here are extremely strict—some lock their doors as soon as class starts, refusing to let students in even if they are just a minute late. There is little flexibility or understanding from the faculty, making the learning experience frustrating. If you’re an international student, I strongly advise you to stay away. Many international students, including myself, have experienced racism from both students and professors. The lack of support and inclusivity makes it even harder to adjust. I wish someone had warned me before enrolling—I regret choosing this college and feel like I wasted my money. If I could do it again, I would have gone to Humber or Sheridan instead, where students are treated with more respect and consideration. If you’re looking for a supportive and welcoming learning environment, I highly suggest looking elsewhere.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close