EADA Business School vs IE University vs Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universitat de les Illes Balears vs Escola d’Art i Superior de Disseny de les Illes Balears
Side-by-side comparison from 417 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical application of business knowledge through real-world cases.
- +Professional faculty with industry experience sharing insights.
- +Personal and professional development focused on leadership and soft skills.
- +excellent education, facilities, and supportive faculty
- +encouragement for individual success and career guidance
- +strong marketing and business programs with practical application
- +Practical, real-world skills training
- +Professional, industry-experienced faculty
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Welcoming campus atmosphere and supportive professors
- +Positive student interactions and friendly people
- +Well-structured and informative academic programs
- +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
- +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Practical, real-world projects with leading companies
- +Supportive professors and personalized feedback
- +International and collaborative community environment
- -Administrative and management issues caused poor communication and inflexibility.
- -Outdated or insufficient facilities detracted from the learning experience.
- -Program content lacked depth and sustainability focus was minimal.
- -Academic deception and low educational standards
- -Marketing promises not matching reality
- -Corporate campus lacking traditional college experience
- -Low professor English proficiency and lack of student/teacher engagement.
- -Poor organization and administrative issues.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and course structure is disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is frustrating.
This university garners excellent reviews across multiple facets. Its location stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest rating. Student life and facilities are also highly regarded. However, accommodation ratings, while still positive, represent the weakest area in comparison to other categories. The university also scores well in internationality, professors, and value.
Remarkably strong performance is evident across most assessed aspects. The university excels particularly in **Internationality**, achieving a rating of 4.76, closely followed by **Location** at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area, receiving a score of 3.78. Other categories like Professors, Student Life, and Facilities also received favorable scores above 4.3.
This institution garners a solid academic reputation, with professors receiving a strong rating of 3.82. While facilities and student life also score well around 3.6, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, rated at 3.16. Internationality and value also present as moderate aspects of the university experience.
With standout scores in **Facilities** (4.5) and **Student Life** (3.75), the university presents appealing aspects. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 2.75. Other categories, including Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value, fall within a solid middle ground.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings in multiple aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded with a score of 4.86, closely followed by location (4.77) and student life (4.76). Facilities and value also receive high marks. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 4.29, though it still indicates a generally positive student experience.
Highly positive feedback (~98%) highlights enriching experiences, practical learning from professionals, and personal development. A small percentage (~2%) of negative reviews mention organizational issues and curriculum execution concerns.
~85% of 155 reviews are positive, praising excellent education, facilities, and faculty support. A small percentage (~3.2%) of negative feedback mentions issues with academic standards and program management.
Approximately 74% of 28 reviews are positive, highlighting professional, sector-active teachers and practical, real-world facilities. A small portion of feedback (~7%) expresses disappointment with low English proficiency among some professors and organizational issues.
With an average rating of 3.6/5 and 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, feedback highlights a friendly campus atmosphere and approachable professors. A minor concern mentioned is difficulty securing student housing.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With 23 positive reviews and zero negative, feedback highlights a highly satisfactory experience. Students praise the program's practical approach, real-world projects with leading companies, and supportive, family-like community. Personalized feedback and a strong network are recurring themes.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
Nothing to show
I'm a physoterapiy student at the University of the Balearic Islands. I recently finished the second year, so I can give my opinion about my teachers and the structure of my campus. In this two years I had some perfect teachers. Their are teachers of Biomechanic, Anatomy and fisiology of the muscle and bone system, palpatory anatomy and image diagnostic, Valoration in physoterapy and Kinesiotherapy. In terms of my campus, there are 5 classes that have stretchers, but not all of them are regulable. Also the students have the possibility to go to the Campus sport, paying a monthly fee or another possibilities (it's very cheap and have a lot of installations).
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
