EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs ESADE Business School vs IE University
Side-by-side comparison from 613 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical and globally recognized programs with relevant, real-world insights.
- +Supportive and experienced professors fostering engaging discussions and personal connections.
- +Vibrant international community and engaging campus life.
- +Practical learning & industry expert professors
- +Real-world application & career opportunities
- +Vibrant student life & global diversity
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Practical and engaging learning with real-world insights
- +Supportive and collaborative cohort fostering community
- +Accessible and helpful faculty and administration
- +Supportive faculty and personalized guidance for academic and career success.
- +Excellent facilities, enriching coursework, and practical skill development.
- +Abundant opportunities and networking for future career prospects.
- +Flexible online learning and self-paced study
- +High-quality teaching materials and organized virtual platform
- +Accessible and supportive professors and tutors
- +Knowledgeable and experienced professors with industry practice
- +Practical and hands-on learning approach
- +Personalized student attention and career development support
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant disruption.
- -Program content and promises are not consistently delivered.
- -Arbitrary grading and lack of flexibility are recurring frustrations.
- -Administrative and management issues create disorganization and unhelpful staff.
- -The educational quality is basic, with little support for extracurriculars and outdated facilities.
- -The university is perceived as a business focused on profit over student education and well-being.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Excessive focus on profit and poor financial handling.
- -Inadequate IT infrastructure and outdated educational systems.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Disappointing academic quality and misleading marketing.
- -Poor program management and perceived lack of flexibility.
- -Uninspiring campus environment and limited student experience.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause significant problems.
- -Unresponsive and unhelpful customer service frustrates students.
- -Poorly organized and user-unfriendly online platforms hinder access to information.
- -administrative & management issues
- -poor communication and transparency
- -difficulties with financial processes
This institution garners impressive scores in most surveyed areas, with **location** standing out as a clear strength, achieving a near-perfect rating. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received very high marks, indicating excellent resources and global reach. Conversely, **accommodation** is the weakest area, though still rated positively. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its environment and student experience, with room for improvement in housing options.
This university excels in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring very highly. **Student Life** and **Facilities** also received favorable ratings. The **weakest area** for the institution is **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. **Value** and **Professors** fall in the mid-range, indicating areas with room for improvement.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This university presents a strong academic profile, with Professors earning the highest rating at 4.38 and Value following closely at 4.16. Internationality also scores well, indicating a diverse environment. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score at 3.60, suggesting it's an area for potential improvement. Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a mid-range, generally positive assessment.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. Internationality stands out with an impressive rating, closely followed by an excellent score for Location. Student life and the quality of Professors also receive high marks. However, Accommodations represent the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Value for money and Facilities are rated favorably, though not as high as the top-performing categories.
A well-rounded university experience is indicated by these ratings. The strongest aspects are the **Location** (3.89) and **Internationality/Value** (both 3.79), suggesting a desirable and globally recognized institution with good perceived worth. **Student Life** (2.67) received the lowest score, pointing to an area that could be improved. Other areas like Professors, Facilities, and Accomodation fall in the mid-range.
Examining the provided ratings reveals a mixed picture. This institution excels in areas such as **professors**, achieving a strong 4 out of 5. It also demonstrates good standing in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring 3. Conversely, significant weaknesses are apparent with zero ratings for **facilities**, **location**, and **accommodation**. **Student life** received a low score of 1.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~95%), praising academic quality, experienced professors, and international atmosphere. A small percentage (~3%) of negative feedback mentioned administrative issues and concerns about program content delivery.
Most reviews (around 74%) are positive, highlighting practical learning and industry-expert professors. A smaller portion (~8.3%) of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and basic education.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~90%), highlighting academic and personal enrichment, practical learning, and a strong sense of community. A small percentage (~10%) express concerns regarding value, specific program quality, and administrative issues.
Approximately 96.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, supportive faculty, and enriching academic/networking opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about academic standards or the campus environment.
~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting a robust virtual campus, flexible online model, and continuous assessment. A small percentage (~10%) of negative feedback mentions administrative errors and poor customer service.
Reviews are predominantly positive (~75%), with students highlighting knowledgeable professors and a practical, in-depth curriculum. A smaller portion (~25%) reported issues with administrative processes.
My time at EADA is something I'll look back on with a big smile. The classes were well paced and the professors were great, not just as teachers but as people. They'd share their own real world experiences which made everything feel much more grounded and useful. Campus life was a lot of fun. Between the events, the outdoor activities and the people you meet across programs, you find your people pretty quickly. EADA has this big family energy that's hard to describe but very easy to feel. And it doesn't stop when you graduate either. The alumni network is genuinely one of the best parts, people actually stay connected and look out for each other. I'd recommend it without hesitation.
I love to take a path in a good environment to perform my ability to intend all the perspective that matches and are suitable for every student in daily lifestyle and work in a way which will be helpful for the needs or students to get higher oppurtuinitied
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
If you are looking for a law specialization master's degree (LLM) in the non so traditional areas of law, and you are seeking for an international fully enriching experience, ESADE is your best choice. ESADE started as a business school so the MBA and other business degrees are their core. Nonetheless, law education and in particular the specialisation master's (international business law and intellectual property and ICT law) are also on the top Europe's LLM of their fields. They combine an excellent program, with the best teachers available in Barcelona and with a more than enough amount of resources to study and help the student to get initiated in their career field. Also, this is the best international experience out there; personally, I got to share a classroom with other 25 students, where only 6 of them were Spanish, the other 19 including myself were a mixture of different nationalities, especially from Latin American countries.
I chose this university because some friends who had studied there had told me it was a great experience, and it's true. It has excellent facilities and a faculty that always encourages you to do your best. They motivate you a lot and guide you in a way I hadn't seen before. They are very approachable professors and are attentive to how they can optimize your studies. I made good friends there, I have good memories of that experience, and I might even pursue some further studies because it left a very positive impression on me.
I started the UOC because I was very interested in Law, however I was already doing a career in a university in person. This undoubtedly, and after two years in it, it is no longer a problem. The UOC gives you the possibility to manage your time to your liking, the material is good (although it could be better and keep updating), and the jobs do not require a giant effort (it depends a lot on the subject). I definitely recommend it if you want to learn at your own pace.
My experience with Inesdi, a business school in Barcelona, was deeply discouraging. After requesting a refund of 200 euros for an unused service, I found myself trapped in a cycle of procrastination and evasion by the admissions manager. What should have been a simple process turned into an ordeal lasting almost three months, with no guarantee of receiving my money back. The lack of transparency and professionalism on the part of Inesdi is worrying. Instead of addressing my request promptly, they seemed more interested in prolonging the process, apparently to avoid fulfilling their obligation to refund the money. After weeks of frustration and multiple contact attempts, I was abruptly informed that my application was no longer eligible, with no clear explanation. In short, my experience with Inesdi was a total disappointment. Your lack of integrity and respect for clients demonstrates a lack of commitment to basic ethical standards. I recommend those considering enrolling at Inesdi to think twice, as it seems that their priority is not providing quality education or satisfactory customer service, but simply money.
