TSM Business School vs Rivne State Humanitarian University vs Misr University for Science & Technology - MUST vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs 6th of October University

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
TSM Business School: wins 0/4 categories
Rivne State Humanitarian University: wins 0/4 categories
Misr University for Science & Technology - MUST: wins 0/4 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 1/4 categories
6th of October University: wins 1/4 categories
Nile University - NU: wins 2/4 categories
National University of Science and Technology - Nust: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Enschede, The Netherlands
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Foreign Languages
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
6th of October City, Egypt
4.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Applied Arts and Science
6th of October City, Egypt
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Computer Science
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
4.67
5.00
Win
4.00
3.67
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.75
5.00
3.75
5.00
4.67
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
4.33
4.25
5.00
Win
4.67
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
5.00
3.50
5.00
3.67
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
4.33
3.75
5.00
Win
3.67
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.33
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
4.60
5.00
Win
4.25
3.00
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Intelligent specialists and creative personalities broaden horizons.
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Well-structured, advanced academic programs
  • +Good facilities and a comfortable, beautiful campus environment
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Strong reputation and industry standing
  • +Diverse academic offerings and facilities
  • +Flexible learning and focus on future careers
  • +Knowledgeable professors and practical, well-structured courses
  • +Excellent lab facilities for hands-on learning
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Strong technical programmes and practical learning opportunities
  • +Dedicated, qualified, and supportive lecturers
  • +Modern facilities and a vibrant campus environment
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant problems.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Lack of engagement and organization in classes
  • -Issues with administrative processes and management
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency create uncertainty and dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Across all surveyed aspects, the university received uniformly average ratings. Its strongest and weakest areas are indistinguishable, as every category—Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value—scored identically. This consistent performance suggests no particular standout strengths or weaknesses are evident based on this assessment.

This institution excels in several key areas, with **location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.75. Facilities, accommodation, and value also receive excellent scores of 4.6. Student life and internationality are well-regarded at 4.4. The **professors** represent the lowest-rated category, though still a strong 4.2, indicating a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university achieves an outstanding rating for its facilities, marking its strongest area. Professors and accommodation also score well, indicating positive experiences in these departments. Internationality presents as the weakest aspect, with a comparatively lower rating. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance across its various offerings.

This institution garners outstanding marks in several key areas, particularly excelling in its professors, location, student life, internationality, and overall value, all receiving perfect scores. Its facilities also contribute positively to the student experience with a strong rating. However, accommodation presents the sole area for potential improvement, indicated by a more moderate score compared to other aspects.

Across various metrics, this institution receives commendations, particularly for its exceptional professors and prime location, both scoring highly. Student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, indicated by lower ratings. Facilities also present a moderately good but not outstanding aspect. Accommodation and value for money are rated quite favorably, suggesting a positive overall experience in these regards.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights intelligent specialists and creative personalities that diversify outlooks. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.4/5, all five reviews are positive. Students highlight the well-structured academic programs, supportive professors, and good facilities. Many appreciate the beautiful campus and opportunities for growth.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4.75/5 average rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight the university's professionalism, comprehensive faculties and majors, and a flexible attendance policy that allows for self-study.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students praise knowledgeable professors, well-structured courses, and excellent lab facilities. The diverse and supportive student community is also highlighted.

The university is highly praised for its academic excellence, practical learning opportunities, and career preparation. All feedback is positive, reflecting strong satisfaction with quality instruction and facilities.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
40%
100%
75%
100%
33%
4★
0%
0%
60%
0%
25%
0%
67%
3★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Why MUST ?

MUST is a private university located in 6th of October City, Egypt, and it was founded in 1996. The university offers undergraduate and graduate programs in a variety of fields, including engineering, business, pharmacy, and mass communication, in additionto languages

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reputable, Respected and Recognized world wide

My experience a NUST was a time to remember. I was in the engineering department. Lecturers were always on time for lecturers, and work and assignments were given and marked. I am the engineer I am owing to the dedication by the chemical engineering lecturers. Quality notes and lecturers are given as well as projects supervision and guidance. Even years after I have graduated, they are still available to give letters of recommendation as per request. My degree is recognized everywhere l have been and l recently got accredited as a professional engineer with ECSA based on my experience and academic background. Campus life as an engineering student is quite dull to be honest, best indulge in sports. During my time I took part in Basketball and athletics. They had transport from campus to the practice courts as the university didn't have an onsite basketball court. As for the ZUSA games where we meet with other universities to compete, I give that 1 star as we had to sleep in the bus over a two-day trip. I don't know if that has improved as resources were truly limited

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close