Universidad Casa Grande vs Namık Kemal University - NKU vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs Swiss School of Higher Education - SSHE

Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Casa Grande: wins 0/2 categories
Namık Kemal University - NKU: wins 0/2 categories
University of Brawijaya - UB: wins 0/2 categories
Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM: wins 0/2 categories
Swiss School of Higher Education - SSHE: wins 0/2 categories
State University of Malang - UM: wins 0/2 categories
The University of Burdwan: wins 2/2 categories
Comparing
Guayaquil, Ecuador
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: International Relations
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: English Language Teaching
Best programme: BA Digital Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
Not rated
4.16
4.00
4.17
4.17
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
Not rated
4.64
5.00
4.80
5.00
5.00
Professors
Not rated
Not rated
4.36
5.00
4.33
4.67
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
5.00
4.33
3.83
5.00
Student life
Not rated
Not rated
4.56
5.00
4.33
4.60
5.00
Value
Not rated
Not rated
4.40
5.00
4.33
4.67
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
Not rated
4.29
4.00
3.83
4.33
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
  • +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
  • +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
  • +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
  • +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
  • +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
  • +Dedicated faculty and personalized guidance
  • +Flexible curriculum and structured learning
  • +Supportive community and industry connections
  • +Supportive and inspiring faculty
  • +Affordable cost of living and study
  • +Positive and student-friendly city environment
  • +Wide range of academic programs
  • +Diverse student body with national and international presence
  • +Hostel accommodation availability
Cons

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
  • -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
  • -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling neglected.
  • -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
  • -Insufficient parking availability.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes.
  • -Poor communication and disorganization from administration are frustrating.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of engaging course material are disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.

Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths across several key areas. Location stands out as the top-rated aspect. Professors, student life, internationality, and overall value also receive highly positive feedback. Conversely, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, receiving the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Facilities also fall somewhat behind the university's stronger performance metrics.

This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.

Across all surveyed aspects, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. It achieved perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students in every evaluated area. No specific weaknesses were identified, as all ratings were uniformly excellent.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.

~83% of reviews highlight exceptional faculty, personalized guidance, and a vibrant, collaborative community. Opportunities for internships and industry connections were also praised. No negative feedback was recorded.

~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with 100% of the single review being highly favorable. Students praise its academic offerings and diverse student body.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
0%
72%
100%
67%
83%
100%
4★
0%
0%
28%
0%
17%
0%
0%
3★
0%
100%
0%
0%
17%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Good Campus

Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.

Nothing to show

Interesting mix of study mayors, and dynamics between students collaborations.

The school have excellent collaboration dynamics between study mayors and external events, Also, excellent personalized guiding assistance in school and potential extra hours mentoring. Looking forward to seeing the amazing results the MBA will bring.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close