The University of Manchester vs University of Leicester vs University of St Andrews vs Brunel Business School vs INSEEC Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 531 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring learning environment and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant student life and city integration
- +Efficient online registration
- +Supportive and accessible faculty
- +Engaging and flexible academic programs
- +Welcoming and diverse student community
- +Inspiring academic atmosphere and dedicated professors
- +Strong sense of community and student belonging
- +Beautiful campus and engaging course content
- +Applied learning and relevant coursework
- +Strong employability and career support
- +Flexible schedules and learning resources
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
- -Lack of relevant course content and poorly structured curriculum.
- -Inaccessible professors and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of practical experience.
- -Inefficient exam formats and time constraints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
- -Unclear communication and bureaucratic processes.
- -Lack of modern resources and support.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong marks across several key areas. Location and internationality stand out as exceptional strengths, both receiving ratings above 4.5. Student life and facilities also perform well, with scores in the low 4.3 range. Accommodation emerges as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.67. Overall value and professor quality are rated positively around 4.1 and 4.2 respectively.
This university demonstrates particular strengths in student life, with a rating of 4.375, and location, scoring 4.319. Internationality also performs well, at 4.307. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score at 3.75, suggesting it is the weakest area. Facilities and professors also received solid scores above 4.0. Value for money is also rated positively at 4.08.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Student Life receive particularly high marks, alongside excellent ratings for Internationality. However, Accomodation emerges as the weakest area, with a notably lower score compared to other categories, while Facilities and Location also present opportunities for improvement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its faculty, with professors receiving a high rating of 4.29. Student life also scores well at 4.08, alongside a strong internationality rating of 4.14. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.0. Conversely, location appears to be the least favored aspect, scoring 3.25. Facilities are moderately rated at 3.85, and accommodation also receives a respectable 3.79.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
Approximately 98.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong learning, engaging teaching, and a vibrant student life. A small number of negative reviews mention disorganized course structures and unfulfilled promises of practical experience.
With an average rating of 4.24/5 from 80 reviews, ~82.5% are positive. Students praise a friendly, student-focused environment with effective communication, cost-friendliness, and safety. A small ~1.3% of feedback mentioned issues with exam timing.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~96% of 79), with students praising the beautiful campus and inspiring academic atmosphere. Professors are noted as knowledgeable and supportive, with excellent course content and abundant student activities. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.64/5 from 14 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise applied learning, employability skills, and support for international students. There are no negative reviews.
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
The course content is well-structured and covers key areas such as digital forensics, threat intelligence, network security, incident response, and cyber risk management. One of the biggest strengths of the programme is its practical approach. Lab-based sessions, real-world case studies, and hands-on tools helped me understand how cyber attacks and investigations work in real scenarios. The lecturers are knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable, and they encourage critical thinking and independent research. The university also offers good learning resources, including online materials, libraries, and lab facilities. Group projects and assignments helped develop teamwork, problem-solving, and technical skills, which are very important for a career in cyber security. Overall, the programme prepared me well for further study and professional opportunities in the cyber security field. However, there are some areas that could be improved. In some modules, the workload was quite heavy within a short period, which made it challenging to manage deadlines. A few topics could have been explained in more depth, especially advanced threat intelligence and real-world industry tools. Additionally, more industry collaboration, internships, or career guidance would make the programme even stronger. Some technical resources and lab environments could also be updated to reflect the latest cyber security trends and technologies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
