London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs London South Bank University - LSBU vs University of St Andrews vs York St John University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 502 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE: wins 1/7 categories
London South Bank University - LSBU: wins 0/7 categories
University of St Andrews: wins 2/7 categories
York St John University: wins 1/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
University of the Highlands and Islands - UHI: wins 2/7 categories
1Training: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
London, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
59 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Saint Andrews, The United Kingdom
4.50
Read more reviews
79 reviews
×
Best programme: History
York, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Digital Business
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: English Literature
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.04
4.00
4.31
4.53
4.56
Win
3.00
Not rated
Location
4.78
4.40
4.05
4.22
4.78
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.26
4.27
4.53
4.28
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
4.11
4.47
4.28
4.67
4.00
Not rated
Student life
3.63
3.64
4.50
Win
4.31
4.00
2.00
Not rated
Value
4.04
3.93
4.41
Win
4.28
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.78
3.64
3.79
4.03
Win
3.22
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and experienced faculty
  • +Supportive and collaborative community atmosphere
  • +Diverse and flexible learning and assessment methods
  • +Practical, industry-focused academics and supportive, knowledgeable faculty
  • +Central London location and excellent, modern facilities/resources
  • +Strong student support services and networking opportunities
  • +Inspiring academic atmosphere and dedicated professors
  • +Strong sense of community and student belonging
  • +Beautiful campus and engaging course content
  • +Small class sizes and detailed teaching
  • +Wide range of courses and specialist staff
  • +Strong student support and engaging activities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Innovative delivery model
  • +Accessible, skilled lecturers

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of structure in academic programs.
  • -Inadequate support services and limited social opportunities.
  • -High fees with perceived low value and administrative issues.
  • -Administrative delays and poor communication.
  • -Lack of peer interaction and community building.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are commonly criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality often fail to meet student expectations.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Perceived strengths of this institution lie significantly in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving top marks. Conversely, **Student Life** emerges as the area with the lowest reported satisfaction. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Value fall within a moderate to good range, indicating generally positive feedback across these aspects.

This university presents a robust academic environment, with particular strengths in **Location** (4.40) and **Professors** (4.27). **Internationality** also scores well (4.11). Areas for potential improvement include **Student Life** (3.64) and **Accomodation** (3.64), which received the lowest ratings. **Facilities** (4.00) and **Value** (3.93) fall within the mid-range of the provided scores.

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas. Professors and Student Life receive particularly high marks, alongside excellent ratings for Internationality. However, Accomodation emerges as the weakest area, with a notably lower score compared to other categories, while Facilities and Location also present opportunities for improvement.

Exceptionally high ratings characterize this university's offerings. The facilities stand out with an impressive score of 4.53, representing its strongest area. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest rating at 4.03. Other areas like professors, student life, internationality, and value all show solid scores above 4.2, indicating a generally positive experience across multiple facets of university life.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

Perceived strengths of this institution lie in its excellent professors, ideal location, and strong international presence, all earning high marks. Student life is identified as a weaker area, receiving a notably lower rating. Other aspects, including facilities, accommodation, and overall value, fall within a positive range.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~74%) are positive, praising academic reputation, expert faculty, and excellent resources. A small percentage (~3.4%) express dissatisfaction with lecturing quality, course structure, or career services.

Approximately 82% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical academic programs, supportive professors with industry insights, and a great London location. One review, representing ~1.7% of feedback, mentioned challenges with building peer connections during remote learning.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~96% of 79), with students praising the beautiful campus and inspiring academic atmosphere. Professors are noted as knowledgeable and supportive, with excellent course content and abundant student activities. No negative reviews were recorded.

With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.19/5, students highlight excellent teaching and small class sizes. They appreciate ample extracurriculars and good student support.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4/5 and 100% positive feedback, reviews highlight UHI's unique partnership model with colleges. Students appreciate the skilled lecturers and innovative video-conferencing approach connecting diverse locations across Scotland.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
34%
34%
56%
22%
67%
0%
0%
4★
44%
44%
41%
75%
33%
100%
0%
3★
19%
20%
4%
3%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great Experience

LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.

Great for graduate opportunities

Study in London without breaking the bank. One of the best modern universities in the United Kingdom. Great for its global appeal and personal approach to student success even after graduation. Located in the centre of one of the biggest cities in the World.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close