ESCP Business School vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SGH Warsaw School of Economics - SGH vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs WSB University - WSB
Side-by-side comparison from 224 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +European campuses and multicultural environment
- +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
- +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
- +Excellent faculty expertise and teaching quality
- +Interesting and practical programs with industry relevance
- +Engaging learning environment and student experience
- +Strong academic programs and reputation
- +Inspiring and supportive learning environment
- +Excellent career opportunities and future prospects
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Supportive teachers and staff with good communication
- +Practical, real-world focused learning and career preparation
- +Flexible study formats, including hybrid and online options
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Advanced technology resources and facilities
- +Expert teachers adapting to modern tech
- +Excellent sports and gym facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause unnecessary bureaucracy.
- -Limited resources and outdated facilities are a problem.
- -Student engagement and focus on personal connections are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and unsupportive staff create a negative learning environment.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & equipment
- -Lack of communication & transparency
Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.
This institution receives high marks in several key areas. Its strongest performance is in **Location**, followed closely by **Professors** and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also rate well. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** emerge as the comparatively weaker aspects, receiving the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest score. Professors and student life also garnered favorable ratings, alongside value and internationality. Facilities are well-regarded, though accommodations represent the weakest area of assessment, scoring notably lower than other categories.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
This university demonstrates particular strengths in its **location**, receiving the highest rating, and also scores well for **internationality**. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** are identified as areas with the lowest scores. Facilities and professors both received solid, mid-range ratings.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its facilities and location, both receiving perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and value for money are also well-regarded, each earning a solid four out of five. The area requiring the most improvement is the professor rating, which stands at three, indicating a potential need for enhancement in this crucial aspect of the educational experience.
Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.
With an average rating of 4.21/5 from 24 reviews, ~91% are positive. Students praise excellent faculty, engaging teaching, and positive learning environments. No negative reviews were reported.
With a 4.32/5 average rating from 31 reviews, ~97% of students are positive, citing strong academic foundation, career opportunities, and inspiring community. One review noted bureaucratic issues.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With an average rating of 4.08/5 from 12 reviews, ~75% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent teachers, good staff communication, practical learning, and opportunities for personal development. No negative reviews were submitted.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being positive. Students commend well-prepared faculty, excellent technological resources like AI and high-quality chips, and top-notch sports and gym facilities.
To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Attending the Warsaw School of Economics has been an enriching journey. The academic standard is impressive, offering a variety of programs that balance solid theoretical knowledge with practical skills. Professors are highly qualified and foster engaging discussions that stimulate intellectual growth. The curriculum is current, reflecting global trends and addressing real-world issues. Accommodation options are diverse, with university dorms offering affordable yet basic living conditions, though they can be competitive to secure. Private rentals are also available, though they tend to be pricier, particularly close to the center of Warsaw. As a Polish student, the tuition fees are quite reasonable in comparison to other European institutions, making SGH an excellent investment in my education. Campus life is dynamic, with numerous student clubs, events, and opportunities to connect with others. The university cultivates a strong community spirit, and there’s always something going on whether academic, social, or cultural. All in all, SGH provides a well-rounded and fulfilling university experience.
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
