SKEMA Business School vs Chimie ParisTech - ENSCP vs EDHEC Business School vs Schiller International University vs Le Wagon
Side-by-side comparison from 219 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Global and diverse student community
- +Strong career and internship opportunities
- +Specialization in chemistry and environmental fields
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Personalized, supportive learning environment with expert guidance
- +Intensive, hands-on curriculum building essential coding skills
- +Diverse international cohort and real-world opportunities
- +Engaging learning environment with interactive methods
- +Diverse and international student community
- +Unique multi-city European study experience
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -Inconvenient and frustrating administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor communication and lack of academic support.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant source of frustration.
- -Inconsistent and uncaring administrative and management support creates significant problems.
- -Inflexible and unhelpful course structures and content hinder learning.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a concern.
- -Lack of transparency and communication is prevalent.
Nothing to show
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
Across all assessed categories, this institution received a rating of 0. This indicates a uniform performance level without any distinct strengths or weaknesses emerging from the provided data. The consistent rating suggests an equal distribution of scores across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Students consistently rate this institution highly, with **Student Life** emerging as its strongest attribute. **Professors** and **Internationality** also receive excellent feedback. The university demonstrates good performance in **Location** and **Accomodation**. Its weakest area is **Value**, although **Facilities** also scored lower than other aspects.
This university garners excellent reviews, particularly excelling in its **professors and location**, both achieving perfect scores. Student life and internationality also stand out with scores above 4.7. Areas with slightly lower, though still strong, ratings include **facilities and accommodation**. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded positive student experience with high marks across most aspects.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, students highlight strong career prospects in chemistry and a global student body. The university's professional network offers many job and internship opportunities.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With an average rating of 4.27/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students praise the high-quality education, supportive environment, and expert professors. Guidance in coding and building real-world experience are frequently highlighted.
Students highly praise the interactive learning, international community, and opportunities for academic and personal growth. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.
Nothing to show
