Cracow University of Economics - CUE vs University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun - UMK vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Vincent Pol University - VPU
Side-by-side comparison from 213 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and engaging academic culture
- +Knowledgeable and accessible instructors
- +Opportunities for socializing and meeting others
- +Helpful and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Enriching academic and personal development opportunities
- +Great student city atmosphere and global opportunities
- +Competent and supportive lecturers and staff
- +High-quality, practical education and training
- +Efficient university management and resources
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Supportive and welcoming academic environment.
- +Diverse student body and cultural exchange.
- +Good facilities and accessible education.
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
- +Friendly atmosphere and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized, practical classes and good support
- +Clear communication and comfortable learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are considered uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are evident.
- -Course content and program structure are not suitable for all students.
- -Limited career opportunities beyond specific fields are a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Poor quality of teaching and outdated curriculum.
- -Issues with lecturer's English proficiency.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities and equipment are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
This institution demonstrates a commendable overall performance, with student life and facilities emerging as its strongest areas, both scoring above 4.4. Internationality and professors also receive solid marks. Accommodations, however, present a relative weakness with a rating of 3.83, suggesting this is an area for potential improvement. The university also fares well in location and value.
This university performs exceptionally well in **Location**, earning a top rating. **Professors** and **Value** also stand out with strong scores. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the lowest-rated aspect, though still a respectable score. Other areas like Facilities, Student Life, and Internationality fall within a generally positive range.
Overall, the university scores well across multiple facets. Accommodation stands out as the strongest area, with a rating of 4.28. Professors and student life also receive high marks, both above 4.1. The weakest area appears to be facilities, rated at 3.95, closely followed by value at 3.89, suggesting these could be opportunities for improvement.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This institution demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. The strongest areas are Location, receiving a perfect score, and Internationality, which is highly rated. Conversely, Accomodation is the weakest point, with a significantly lower score compared to other categories. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are all rated moderately well, indicating areas of general satisfaction.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across most aspects, achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Internationality. Accommodations are rated slightly lower but still very positively at 4. Overall, it presents a highly desirable and well-rounded university experience, with its primary area for potential improvement being student housing.
With a 4.29/5 average rating from 49 reviews, ~98% are positive, highlighting supportive staff and engaging academic environments. A small amount of negative feedback exists.
With ~83% of 67 reviews being positive, students praise helpful lecturers, great atmosphere, and academic/personal growth opportunities. A small ~4.5% of negative feedback mentions disappointing course relevance and limited opportunities.
All 19 reviews are positive, with students highlighting well-trained staff, competent lecturers, and a pleasant learning atmosphere. Some mention technical issues, but this is a minor recurring theme.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive academics, a welcoming atmosphere, and diversity. Around 12.5% of feedback expresses concerns regarding curriculum adherence and lecturer English proficiency.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a friendly atmosphere, approachable lecturers, and well-organized, practical classes. The student experienced good support, clear communication, and a comfortable learning environment.
Nothing to show
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
The best part of my college experience is that everyone feels welcome and does their best to help. The teachings are at a very high level. It's very difficult to learn when using English as a second language, but I've learned a lot and expected it. The Clinical Skills Suite is comparable to other universities, which is why I was convinced that I would choose cm umk as my chosen university. The laboratory is also well equipped and all procedures are very strictly adhered to for our own safety. The campus is in the middle of town with easy access to grocery stores and nearby coffee shops. The city's campus is close to most dormitories, saving you money on public transport. The campus has a modern design, but more importantly, it is kept to a high standard and very clean 24 hours a day. Much effort has been put into keeping it clean, which shows it. It feels like a house away from home. Student unions are great and student life is very personal to everyone, but I have to say that the experience and life of the entire university is a place where the best memories can be made. The only thing I wasn't very happy with was the student support. It would be very helpful if someone could introduce me to writing essays, case scenario essays, reflections, and other scientific research face-to-face.
Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
