IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs IDRAC Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 486 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ENOES - ENOES (5.00)
IÉSEG School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
EDHEC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 0/7 categories
IDRAC Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole des Ponts Business School: wins 1/7 categories
ENOES - ENOES : wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: MBA IT Business Engineering
Best programme: AI in Project Management
Paris, France
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Category ratings
Facilities
4.08
4.21
4.23
4.44
4.75
4.50
5.00
Win
Location
4.29
4.23
3.77
4.74
4.50
4.60
5.00
Win
Professors
4.28
4.38
4.32
4.75
4.75
4.83
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.55
4.39
4.45
4.60
4.50
4.67
Win
3.00
Student life
4.25
4.14
4.13
4.56
4.75
4.50
5.00
Win
Value
4.31
4.06
4.06
4.50
4.75
4.17
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.78
3.58
3.21
4.32
4.75
3.33
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and practical learning experiences
  • +Strong international and diverse community
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
  • +Industry relevance and practical skills
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Career opportunities and personal development
  • +Outstanding teaching quality and practical, employer-aligned courses
  • +Strong corporate network and valuable career services
  • +Rigorous academics with practical industry insights
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Excellent facilities and convenient location
  • +Strong academic and personal development support
  • +Strong academic support and faculty availability
  • +Practical, real-world business focus and company connections
  • +Emphasis on international perspective and personal/professional development
  • +Transformative personal and professional growth
  • +Practical, market-relevant skills for career advancement
  • +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging courses
  • +High-quality teaching from experienced, industry-connected professionals.
  • +Personalized guidance and effective learning support for each student.
  • +Programs aligned with job market demands.
Cons
  • -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
  • -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
  • -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
  • -High tuition fees and perceived poor value for money are a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
  • -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent complaint.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are major dissatisfactions.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinder learning and development.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.

Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.

The university excels in Internationality with a rating of 4.45, closely followed by its Professors at 4.32 and Facilities at 4.23. Student Life and Value also receive positive marks. Conversely, Accomodation presents the weakest area, scoring 3.21, with Location also being a moderate concern at 3.77. Overall, the institution demonstrates strengths in its academic and global offerings, while areas concerning student living arrangements and campus surroundings could see improvement.

Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.

Across several key areas, this institution garners exceptionally high ratings. Facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and value all received outstanding scores of 4.75. Location and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.5. This indicates a consistently positive experience for students, with its strongest attributes lying in its academic and residential offerings.

Overall, this university receives commendations across most aspects, with particularly high marks for its professors (4.83) and internationality (4.67). Facilities and student life also score well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.33. Value for money is rated at a solid 4.17.

This institution achieves excellent marks across the board, with perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. Its strongest areas clearly lie in these fundamental aspects of the student experience. The university's weakest area, indicated by a moderate rating, is internationality.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.

~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 4.25/5 from 48 reviews, ~74% of feedback is positive. Students highlight outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, strong industry alignment, and excellent career services/alumni networks. One negative review mentioned high tuition fees.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.75/5. Students praise approachable professors and practical, international learning experiences. Some note campus facilities and student life could be improved with more funding.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students highlight challenging and transformative experiences, career advancements, and high-quality courses and professors.

The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This suggests excellent teaching quality and strong career preparation, with ~100% of feedback being positive. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
49%
50%
38%
75%
75%
50%
100%
4★
44%
42%
53%
25%
25%
50%
0%
3★
8%
7%
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A formative and enriching experience

IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Enriching Experience

I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.

Nothing to show

Excellent Experience at IDRAC

I am a Chinese student and I completed my MBA in Business Engineering at IDRAC Business School and the experience has been excellent. The program fully met my expectations. The professors are very approachable, supportive, and always available. I truly appreciated the strong sense of guidance and personal support throughout the course. Highly recommended!

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close