SKEMA Business School vs International School of Management vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Universidade Estadual de Londrina
Side-by-side comparison from 232 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Global perspective and international exposure
- +Practical, real-world business application
- +Strong academic programs and skill development
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Dedicated, empathetic, and researcher professors providing practical, dense learning
- +Inspiring learning and growth opportunities with research access
- +Accessible resources like the University Restaurant and interdisciplinary course options
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
- +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
- +Good research and outreach programs
- +Strong agriculture programmes.
- -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and communication problems.
- -Teaching quality is poor, with faculty lacking student support and focus on profit.
- -Exams and results are poorly managed, impacting student progression.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative & management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment frustrate students.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum design lead to student dissatisfaction.
Examining the provided university ratings reveals a generally positive student experience, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.43. Professors and Location also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest aspect, scoring 3.71, suggesting an area for potential improvement. The remaining categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, fall within a solid range, indicating a good overall offering.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With strong endorsements for its professors and perceived value, this institution garners positive feedback. Students also appreciate the campus location and vibrant student life. However, the facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement. Internationality also sits in the mid-range of ratings.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.
This institution shines in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for its **facilities, location, student life, and internationality**. Areas for improvement include **professors and value**, both receiving mid-range scores. Accommodation is also a positive, rated highly. This suggests a university offering an excellent environment and experience, with opportunities to enhance academic and perceived financial worth.
The vast majority of reviews are positive, praising the international environment, practical skills, and global opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and program organization.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 4.4/5, ~93% of reviews are positive. Students praise dedicated professors, research opportunities, and inspiring learning experiences. Some mention infrastructure could improve, but this is a minor point.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.
This university has a strong agriculture program, but other areas like health may be less developed. The single review is positive, giving an average rating of 4/5.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
