London Metropolitan University vs University of East London - UEL vs Royal Docks Business School vs INSEEC Business School vs European School of Economics - ESE
Side-by-side comparison from 197 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive mentors and approachable, knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse, multicultural environment and wide range of course options.
- +Career-focused programs with an emphasis on practical learning and employability.
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning and career support
- +Supportive, approachable, and knowledgeable staff
- +Diverse and friendly environment fostering friendships
Nothing to show
- +Practical, group-focused learning and professional initiation.
- +High-quality teaching and supportive faculty mentorship.
- +Strong professional network and vibrant student life.
- +International relevance & practical/hands-on experience
- +Welcoming & supportive environment with friendly, helpful staff/faculty
- +Diverse, small classes with experienced professors
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Poor course structure and lack of preparation for the workforce.
- -Subpar facilities and unresponsive program office.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant student frustration.
- -Course content lacks relevance and is poorly delivered.
- -Limited support and inaccessible facilities are recurring problems.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
- -Lack of student support and responsiveness from administration.
- -Uninspiring curriculum and teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are often criticized.
- -Poor teaching quality and unengaging course content are commonly cited.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not uniformly outstanding experience.
This institution earns high marks for its **Location** (4.39) and **Facilities** (4.33), indicating these are considerable strengths. **Professors** (4.25) and **Internationality** (4.25) also received favorable scores. Areas with lower ratings include **Student Life** (3.88) and **Accomodation** (3.69), suggesting these aspects might present opportunities for improvement. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with some standout features.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a high rating of 4.64. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are also well-regarded. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.5. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a moderate to good range.
Student feedback indicates strong satisfaction across several aspects of university life. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, with internationality and professors also receiving excellent marks. While student life and value are also highly regarded, facilities represent the weakest area among the surveyed categories. Overall, the institution demonstrates a solid performance with clear strengths in its external and academic offerings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 93% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive faculty, diverse environments, and career-focused programs. A small percentage (around 7%) express dissatisfaction with teaching quality, course structure, or facilities.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (approximately 97%) highlights supportive, diverse environments and industry-relevant practical learning. A small percentage (~3%) noted issues with lecturer responsiveness and course relevance.
Nothing to show
Most student feedback is positive (~63% 4-5 stars), highlighting excellent pedagogy, practical experiences, and supportive staff. The average rating is 3.81/5, with no negative reviews.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~95% of feedback highlighting an engaging, internationally relevant learning experience and a welcoming environment. Students appreciate practical learning, helpful staff, and international class settings. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
LondonMet is a great place to have an international experience for foreign students @ different levels. Whether you may search for an affordable and certified executive studies or you may search for a multicultural experience meeting people from all over the world. I personally, find it a great option for a post graduate level of studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a lot of qualities such as adapting to students in order to optimize learning, and the desire to confront the student as quickly as possible with the world of work. On the other hand, I would criticize this school for poorly disseminated information and a gloomy community life.
First of all since my campus was in the heart of Rome, the place and inside of the university was like a whole museum. I love how friendly and helpful the staff was, the professors were one in a million. I love how they did all their best to tell us about the subjects in detail and in a fun way with examples for us to get into it more. I liked how they make time and engage in it and actually help us to teach us, so it was all in one reading writing with our own brain and infos searching for the sources by ourselves listening but also being able to express our own way of knowledge on the topics!
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
