Warsaw University of Technology vs WSB University - WSB vs Lazarski University vs Kozminski University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University
Side-by-side comparison from 253 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, passionate, and expert faculty
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs
- +Practical, hands-on education with industry relevance
- +Practical focus and internship opportunities
- +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
- +Welcoming environment and competent staff
- +Excellent teachers and practical, real-world learning
- +Engaging and supportive learning environment
- +Modern facilities and international community
- +Expert and approachable faculty with practical industry experience.
- +Modern, well-equipped facilities and a vibrant, diverse campus life.
- +Strong academic programs focused on practical knowledge and professional development.
- +High education level and experienced professors
- +Valuable new skills acquisition
- +Worthwhile academic decision
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Supportive staff and dedicated professors
- +Small class sizes and engaging learning opportunities
- +Strong academic programs with updated knowledge and practical skills.
- +Experienced and dedicated faculty creating an engaging learning environment.
- +Focus on career development and job market readiness.
- -Lack of clear communication and administrative support is frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient feedback are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Poor organization and unqualified instructors are a major concern.
- -A lack of English proficiency among the student body hinders integration.
- -Inadequate student support systems are a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and resources
- -Lack of practical application and career support
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of communication and disregard for student concerns on crucial issues.
- -Disappointing student experience and unfulfilled expectations.
- -Administrative and management issues, including registration errors and unexpected fees.
- -Poor quality of teaching and lack of engaging course content.
- -Insufficient student life facilities and inadequate communication.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **Location**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also scored very highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation** and **Internationality**, which registered lower scores compared to other aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within a solid mid-range, indicating generally positive experiences in these domains.
This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.
An excellent performance is evident across several key areas for this university. Its strongest areas are Internationality (4.63), Facilities (4.61), and Value (4.62), indicating a highly positive student experience in these aspects. Professors and Location also receive very strong scores. The weakest area appears to be Accomodation, with a rating of 3.87, suggesting room for improvement in this particular category.
Overall, this institution garners impressive scores in multiple facets. Its strongest areas are Professors and Internationality, both receiving a near-perfect 4.57. Facilities are also highly regarded at 4.51. The weakest, though still solid, is Location, with a rating of 4.08.
This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.
This university receives strong marks, particularly for its **location** (4.7) and **internationality** (4.3). Areas like **facilities** and **value** also score well at 4.0. The **student life** rating is solid at 3.9. The **accommodation** category presents the weakest performance with a 3.3 rating, suggesting room for improvement in student housing.
Overall, the university receives favorable ratings. Its strongest areas are Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.2. Professors and Facilities also perform well with identical scores of 4.125. The university's weakest point is Accomodation, which received the lowest rating. Student Life and Value are mid-range performers.
With a 4.23/5 average rating from 22 reviews, students praise excellent faculty and engaging programs. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting recognized technology programs and a positive learning experience.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.
With ~92% of 112 reviews being positive, students praise facilities, experienced teachers, and practical learning. A single negative review noted disorganization and an unsupportive student body.
Nearly all students praise the university's excellent academics, highly qualified and approachable professors, and modern facilities. The strong focus on practical knowledge and professional development, along with a vibrant international environment, are key highlights. No negative feedback was reported.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.
University reviews are largely positive (approximately 93%), with students appreciating the international environment and supportive staff. A small portion (~7%) expressed dissatisfaction regarding a canceled graduation ceremony.
~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong programs, engaging faculty, and career preparation. A small minority (~5%) mention administrative issues and a lack of student life facilities.
Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate
Nothing to show
The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.
