Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ vs Estácio vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF
Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Extensive opportunities for research and extracurricular projects.
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors and mentors.
- +Strong industry connections and company partnerships.
- +Excellent professors and quality teaching
- +Flexible class schedules and balance with other responsibilities
- +Good infrastructure and student benefits/opportunities
- +Excellent professors and project encouragement
- +Strong infrastructure and facilities
- +Career opportunities and international recognition
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Renowned academic programmes and diverse, interdisciplinary education
- +Valuable student support, resources, and opportunities
- +Qualified faculty and excellent campus facilities
- +Excellent teaching and professor support
- +Diverse and inclusive environment
- +Wide course variety
- +Practical and accessible learning environment
- +Helpful professors and useful classes
- +Welcoming atmosphere
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -Concerns exist about the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for distance learning students are problematic.
- -The institution's financial focus overshadows student welfare and education.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor academic outcomes.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication cause frustration.
- -Limited course selection and rigid academic policies hinder student progress.
Overall, this university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving very high marks. **Internationality** is also a significant strength. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, scoring the lowest. **Facilities** and **Location** received moderate ratings, while **Student Life** is also a positive aspect.
This institution receives strong acclaim for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.27. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning 4.05. The **Location** is rated at a solid 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3.5, and **Internationality** also presents a lower score at 3.41. **Value** falls in the middle at 3.68.
The university exhibits strong performance in key areas, particularly in **Value (5)**, **Professors (4.5)**, and **Location (4.5)**. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.5)** stands out as the weakest aspect. Other areas, including Facilities and Student Life, receive solid scores, while Internationality is rated moderately.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and the quality of its professors, both receiving top marks. Value for money also stands out as a significant positive. Conversely, accommodation presents a considerable challenge, scoring the lowest among all categories. While student life and internationality are rated moderately well, facilities also fall into the average range, suggesting potential areas for improvement.
This university scores exceptionally well in areas such as professors, student life, and internationality, all receiving perfect or near-perfect marks. Value for money is also a standout strength. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, while facilities and location fall in the mid-range. Overall, it offers a highly regarded academic and social experience.
Exceptional marks highlight the university's strengths in facilities, professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Conversely, internationality and value are identified as areas for improvement, with lower ratings of 3. The location also received a good, but not perfect, score of 4.
All 16 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.44/5. Students highlight enriching experiences, valuable classes, and numerous opportunities for research and projects. Some mention infrastructure issues and teaching methods as minor drawbacks.
~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, good infrastructure, and flexible schedules. A small portion of feedback (~13%) mentions concerns about financial focus and inconsistent teaching.
With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Positive themes highlight excellent infrastructure, career opportunities, and great laboratories. Minor concerns about room ventilation and bathrooms were noted.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the breadth of course offerings and the quality of professors, highlighting opportunities and a critical perspective in education. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from two reviews, students praise the university's great teachers, diverse courses, and supportive professors. The calm, safe environment and inclusive atmosphere are also highlighted, with no negative feedback recorded.
With an average rating of 5/5, the single review is entirely positive. The reviewer found professors helpful, classes practically useful, and the environment welcoming, recommending the university for a practical experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
