SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs FAE Centro Universitário vs Universidade Estadual de Londrina
Side-by-side comparison from 158 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Strong preparation for the job market and career readiness
- +Excellent facilities and a welcoming academic environment
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Inclusive and diverse student community
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +High-quality and relevant academic programs
- +Excellent teaching and free tuition.
- +Abundant student events, lectures, and free courses.
- +Up-to-date technological equipment in classrooms.
- +Value for money and quality of materials
- +Supportive and attentive teachers
- +Flexible learning for those with other responsibilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources detract from the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative issues and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This institution receives its highest marks for Value, with an impressive score. Location also stands out as a significant strength. Areas requiring the most improvement are Accomodation and Internationality, which received the lowest ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated similarly well, while Student Life falls in the middle range.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **value**, all receiving a strong score of 4. Conversely, its weakest areas are **accommodation** and **internationality**, both rated a low 1, indicating potential challenges in these aspects. **Facilities** and **student life** fall in the mid-range with scores of 2 and 3 respectively.
Performance exhibits a mixed yet generally positive picture. The university excels in its **location** and **student life**, both receiving top marks of 5. Areas of **facilities** and **accommodation** are its weakest points, rated at 3. **Professors** and **value** are strong at 4, while **internationality** scores a respectable 3.5. Overall, the institution offers significant strengths in its environment and student experience.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With an average rating of 4.56/5, nearly all (~100%) of the 9 reviews are positive, praising excellent teaching quality, dedicated professors, and strong preparation for the job market. A slight suggestion for more professional education was mentioned.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.
With one review and an average rating of 4/5, feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlighted excellent teaching and a peaceful campus life with many events and free courses. Minor concerns included precarious physical infrastructure and the lack of a free cafeteria.
With an average rating of 3.5/5 based on two reviews, positive feedback (~50%) highlights good value, up-to-date materials, and attentive teachers. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
