SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA vs Universidade Salvador - UNIFACS vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Bahia State University - UNEB

Side-by-side comparison from 182 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade Federal da Bahia - UFBA: wins 3/7 categories
Universidade Salvador - UNIFACS: wins 3/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/7 categories
Bahia State University - UNEB: wins 0/7 categories
Bahian Institute of Higher Education - IBES UNIP: wins 0/7 categories
Federal University of Southern Bahia - UFSB: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: History
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
10 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Pharmacy
Best programme: Digital Media
Category ratings
Facilities
4.21
4.00
5.00
Win
4.40
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.23
4.67
5.00
Win
4.70
4.67
Not rated
2.00
Professors
4.38
4.67
Win
4.33
4.60
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.39
3.50
3.33
4.60
Win
3.33
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.14
4.67
Win
4.00
3.90
4.33
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.06
4.83
Win
3.00
3.90
4.33
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
3.58
3.20
4.00
Win
3.00
3.67
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Industry relevance and practical skills
  • +International exposure and diverse student body
  • +Career opportunities and personal development
  • +Supportive and kind people and helpful supervisors
  • +Engaging campus life and activities
  • +Competent and dedicated tutors
  • +Accessible campus and reasonable tuition
  • +Dedicated and attentive professors
  • +Helpful administration and financial aid
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Accessible, affordable education with excellent faculty.
  • +Convenient location and transportation options.
  • +Emphasis on diversity and student support services.

Nothing to show

  • +Helpful faculty and guidance
  • +Relevant and practical skills
  • +Good career prospects
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare and discriminatory practices.
  • -Ineffective career guidance and problematic teaching faculty.
  • -Students express dissatisfaction with administrative and management issues.
  • -There are recurring complaints about outdated facilities and poor maintenance.
  • -Students report a lack of effective communication and support from staff.
  • -Overpriced tuition and fees do not match the quality of education or facilities.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including labs and technology, hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management systems lead to poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and lack of personal attention are common complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration and delays.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and social aspects of the institution received particularly high marks, with Professors and Internationality scoring above 4.3. Facilities and Location also performed well, both exceeding 4.2. Student Life and Value were rated positively around 4.1. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, which received a score of 3.58.

Outstanding marks were awarded for the university's value, with a near-perfect score, and for its professors, location, and student life, all receiving strong ratings. The facilities also earned a solid score. However, accommodation and internationality received the lowest marks, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

This institution excels in its **Facilities** and **Location**, both receiving perfect scores. **Professors** are also highly regarded. Areas for improvement include **Internationality** and **Value**, which are rated significantly lower. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** fall into the middle range of the provided scores.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This university presents a well-rounded profile, with exceptionally strong ratings in **Location** and **Student Life**, both scoring a high 4.67. **Professors** also receive excellent marks, matching **Student Life** at 4.33, alongside a commendable **Value** score. Areas for improvement include **Internationality**, which is the weakest category at 3.33, and **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, both rated at 3.67.

Nothing to show

With a rating of 4 out of 5, the university excels in both **Professors** and **Value**. Conversely, its **Location** is identified as the weakest area, receiving a rating of 2. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality all received a solid, respectable score of 3, indicating a generally consistent experience across these departments.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~97.5% of 161 reviews are positive, highlighting practical, industry-oriented programs, excellent teaching, and international environments. A small ~2.5% of feedback mentions poor management and communication.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 6 reviews, feedback is predominantly positive (~67%). Students praise supportive supervisors, kind people, and engaging campus life. Some noted minor areas for improvement in online presence and awareness of social activities.

With an average rating of 4/5 stars, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent, accessible campuses and dedicated professors. A small percentage of feedback noted minor curriculum gaps in business management for specific courses.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

The university is praised for its excellent professors, Accounting program, and commitment to diversity. Positive feedback also highlights convenient location and ample parking. Some students mentioned affordable tuition for public institutions.

Nothing to show

The university has a decent physical structure, especially for its location. While this single review is positive (4/5 stars), it notes that course organization and clarity for new students could be improved.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
33%
33%
60%
0%
0%
0%
4★
42%
33%
33%
40%
67%
0%
100%
3★
7%
33%
33%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close