Sciences Po vs ICN Business School vs Université de Lorraine vs École Nationale Supérieure d'Agronomie et des Industries Alimentaire - ENSAIA vs CESI
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary curriculum and diverse academic focus
- +Networking opportunities and career prospects
- +Vibrant student life and diverse community
- +Diverse and international student body
- +Affordable and convenient programs
- +Strong academic reputation and programs
- +Exceptional academic programs and quality education
- +Supportive and approachable faculty and researchers
- +Lively campus with good opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +High-quality, diverse agri-food training
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Positive student life and atmosphere
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Engaging professors and quality of classes
- +Positive university atmosphere and facilities
- +Excellent sports activities
- -Academics are often ineffective and lack preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
- -Facilities are perceived as outdated and insufficient.
- -Excessive administrative and management issues hinder progress.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create an unpleasant learning environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors and the institution causes frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources were frequently mentioned.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations led to dissatisfaction.
- -Lack of administrative support and inefficient management are major frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources hinder effective learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor infrastructure are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
This university garners impressive scores, particularly for its **Internationality**, which stands out at 4.7. **Location** and **Value** also score very highly, both at 4.39. Student life and professors also received strong ratings above 4.2. The weakest area appears to be **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.16, while facilities are rated at 3.83.
Overall, this institution receives positive evaluations, with its **location** standing out as a significant strength, achieving the highest rating. Facilities and student life also scored well, both at 4. Accommodations are a slightly weaker point, rated at 3.5, while the ratings for professors and internationality are comparable and solid.
This university garners exceptional ratings for its professors, who received a high score of 4.33. Location and student life also score well at 4. Conversely, the institution's weakest areas are internationality and value, both averaging 3.44. Facilities and accommodation present a middle ground with scores around 3.7.
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in several key areas, with student life and accommodation both receiving an excellent 4.5 rating. Conversely, facilities and internationality are noted as the weaker aspects, each scoring a 3. Professors are well-regarded at 4, and the university also offers good value at 4. The location also received a 3.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Outstanding marks are awarded for facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving a perfect score. While internationality is a strong point at four, professors and overall value are areas that received moderate ratings.
With ~96% positive feedback and an average 4.08/5 rating, students praise the interdisciplinary curriculum, academic excellence, and vibrant student life. A small ~4% of reviews express disappointment with specific academic approaches.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, positive feedback (~100%) highlights diversity, affordability, and strong alumni networks. Students also recommend it for rigorous programs and convenient international student support.
All nine reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.11/5. Students praise the excellent research environment, high-quality education, and approachable, supportive faculty. The diversity of programs is also a recurring positive theme.
With an average rating of 4/5, university student reviews are highly positive. Students highlight high-quality, diverse training in agri-food, good professor-student relationships, and a healthy atmosphere, with no negative feedback recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is 4/5, reflecting overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%). Recurring themes include a good atmosphere, quality facilities and sports activities. Some mention mixed feelings about classes, depending on professors.
I'm an exchange student in the Reims campus in the academic year of 2023-2024. I think this campus is good for an exchange experience because there are a lot of exchange students and even the french people who come to the grad school don't live in Reims, so basically everyone on the campus is new to the city and wants to form a bond. In terms of academic experience, I think Sciences Po system is really controlling. Their attendance policy is really strict and all the classes have an assignment for the week, either a presentation or an evaluation, which makes the semester exhausting since the beginning. Also, I didn't like the fact that in some classes there are only presentations made by students and no later explanation by the professor. I don't like this method because I think the students only focus on preparing their presentation and we don't really pay attention to the presentation of the other classmates as much as we would pay as if the professor was presenting. To summarize, I still love some of my classes, but I had higher expectations about Sciences Po's method, since it's the best political sciences university in Europe, which made me a little disappointed.
First of all, the courses taught in this course are of high quality, partly due to the quality of the speakers in the school. The courses are complete and are in line with current trends. However, the speakers were not all very qualitative, whether in terms of communicating the homework to be done or their lessons. Overall the program is open to international but having been educated at the time of the COVID-19 epidemic, I could not get an idea of the international side of this school. Thus, the Bachelor's at ICN Business School is a fairly versatile course, focused on the different areas that can be found in management (communication, accounting, CV creation workshops and cover letters, etc.) Concerning opportunities, because of the partnerships that the school maintains with many large companies, I find that it is simple having gone through this school to apply for and obtain a work contract, both in France and abroad. the international.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
