SKEMA Business School vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Schiller International University vs Southern University and A&M College vs Meridian University
Side-by-side comparison from 320 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Critical thinking and personal growth
- +Supportive instructors and diverse community
- +Practical experience and career preparation
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
Nothing to show
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- +strong design and practical application programs
- +knowledgeable and supportive faculty
- +collaborative and growth-oriented learning environment
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Insufficient support for online students and inflexible course structures.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful TAs.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues cause frustration.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and relevant curriculum.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
This university garners strong evaluations across several key areas. Professors receive the highest marks, indicating a significant strength in teaching quality. The weakest area is student life, though it still maintains a positive rating. Other aspects such as facilities, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated comparably well, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
This institution garners excellent feedback in several key areas, achieving a solid 4 out of 5 for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value. However, its location received a notably low score of 0, indicating a significant area for improvement compared to its otherwise strong performance.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With ~99% positive sentiment, reviews highlight critical thinking, diverse programs, and supportive instructors. A small ~1% of feedback mentions issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This positive feedback highlights an exceptional Master's program experience, emphasizing strong curriculum balance and dedicated faculty. No negative feedback was provided.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
Nothing to show
