National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Elbrus Coding Bootcamp

Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO (5.00)
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/7 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 7/7 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Advanced Management Institute: wins 0/7 categories
Voronezh State University of Forestry and Technologies - VSUFT: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Computer Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
4.14
4.14
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.67
4.64
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.33
4.18
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Internationality
4.18
4.39
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.10
4.85
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Value
4.48
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Accommodation
3.99
3.66
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Specialized forestry, engineering, and industrial technology programs
  • +Strong expertise in forestry engineering, transport systems, and industrial technologies
  • +Bachelor's programs in technical and applied fields
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning and engagement.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with its location receiving the highest rating at 4. Across the board, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a consistent 3.5, indicating a good, though not exceptional, experience in these areas. The standout feature is its advantageous location.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted specialized programs in forestry and industrial technologies. No negative reviews were recorded.

Rating distribution
5★
65%
44%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
4★
22%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
2★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close