Lübeck University of Applied Sciences vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs University of Bergen vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Architectural Association School of Architecture - AA
Side-by-side comparison from 22 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied, and real-world-oriented programs
- +Affordable or free tuition
- +Clear and detailed admission and enrollment information
- +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
- +Practical approach and industry connections
- +Good location and food variety
- +Excellent academic programs and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong student support services and welfare provisions
- +Vibrant international community and city-integrated campus life
- +Free tuition and diverse program options
- +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
- +Supportive environment and welcoming community
- +Strong urban planning and architecture programs
- +Flexible hybrid learning options
- +Integrated learning of urban scale and architectural details
- +Welcoming and multicultural campus environment
- +Conducive learning atmosphere
- +International student diversity
- +Flexible online format and structure
- +Career-focused and practical learning
- +Supportive instructors and engaging lectures
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are often mentioned.
- -Overcrowded classes and a lack of individual attention are concerns.
- -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
- -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
- -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Outdated or problematic lecture streaming software hinders communication with instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues create a frustrating student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
- -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent complaints.
- -Excessive fees and poor financial transparency.
- -Inadequate student support services and career guidance.
- -Disappointing facilities and outdated technology.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates a negative student experience.
This institution shines particularly brightly in its location and student life, both receiving a strong 4.5 rating. Value also scores highly at 4.5. Conversely, the professor rating stands out as the weakest area with a 2.5. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 3.5.
This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.
This institution demonstrates excellent performance, with student life and location receiving the highest marks at approximately 4.43 and 4.33 respectively. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality are all rated a solid 4. Professors represent the weakest area, scoring 3.86. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded experience, with particular strengths in its vibrant student community and convenient setting.
This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding performance. Every category, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value, received a perfect score of 5 out of 5. This indicates a uniformly excellent experience for students, with no discernible weak areas according to these ratings.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths, achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, receiving solid ratings. The university excels particularly in its infrastructure, academic staff, geographical position, global outlook, and affordability, while student engagement and housing offerings are commendable.
This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving top scores of 4.5. **Value** also stands out at a high 4.5. Conversely, **Location** received the lowest rating at 3. The remaining areas of Facilities, Student Life, and Accommodation are rated solidly at 3.5, indicating a generally positive, though not exceptional, experience in these aspects.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from two reviews, students highlight the program's practical, applied nature and its focus on real-world engineering applications. The free tuition is also a significant positive.
With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.
With a 4.14/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive, highlighting a good learning environment and student welfare services. A small percentage (~14.3%) of feedback mentioned issues with lecture streaming software.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive student feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students particularly praise the strong urban planning and architecture programs, highlighting the integration of urban scale projects with architectural details.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university received one overwhelmingly positive review. The reviewer highlighted a friendly and clean campus, conducive to learning, and appreciated the multicultural atmosphere with a diverse student body. There were no negative reviews.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviews highlight convenience and structure in online formats, alongside supportive instructors and career-focused, practical learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
