Cleveland State University - CSU vs Universidad Nacional de Trujillo - UNITRU vs Universidad Privada del Norte - UPN vs Innopolis University vs University of Northern Colorado - UNC

Side-by-side comparison from 278 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Cleveland State University - CSU (4.70)
Cleveland State University - CSU: wins 4/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Trujillo - UNITRU: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Privada del Norte - UPN: wins 0/7 categories
Innopolis University: wins 0/7 categories
University of Northern Colorado - UNC: wins 3/7 categories
Ilia State University - ISU: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
99 reviews
×
Best programme: History
Best programme: Bachelor of Science in Clinical Nutrition and Dietetics
Innopolis, Russia
4.10
Read more reviews
155 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Greeley, Colorado, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
4.64
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.56
4.00
3.55
4.40
Location
4.76
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.72
4.50
4.18
4.70
Professors
4.77
Not rated
4.00
4.43
5.00
Win
3.82
4.60
Internationality
4.60
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.44
4.00
3.55
4.60
Student life
4.63
Not rated
4.00
4.05
5.00
Win
3.55
3.90
Value
4.45
Not rated
4.00
4.13
4.50
Win
3.73
3.90
Accommodation
4.49
Win
Not rated
4.00
3.69
4.00
2.64
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional faculty expertise and mentorship
  • +Excellent learning opportunities and engaging instruction
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment with top-notch amenities

Nothing to show

  • +Career advancement and positive experiences
  • +High value and useful knowledge gained
  • +International and collaborative community
  • +Strong focus on practical, real-world projects
  • +Expert faculty and personalized mentorship
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and approachable, helpful faculty.
  • +Personalized attention due to smaller class sizes.
  • +Positive lecturer-student relationships fostering engagement and reduced stress.
  • +Internationally recognized curriculum and knowledgeable, supportive professors.
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful community.
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and active participation.
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching methods leads to disinterest.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unengaging curriculum are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and course structure leads to confusion.
  • -Inadequate practical experience and reliance on theory.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated assessment styles.
  • -Limited support for internships and real-world application.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly for its professors, who received the highest marks. Students also appreciate the location and facilities. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and the value proposition, though these still maintain solid scores. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive student experience.

Nothing to show

Across multiple facets, the institution garners consistently strong ratings, with all surveyed areas achieving a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded experience for students. No single category stands out as significantly weaker than others, as the performance is uniform.

Demonstrating notable strengths, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, the **Internationality** aspect appears to be the weakest area, alongside **Accomodation** and **Location**. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within the middle tier of assessments.

This institution receives excellent marks, notably for its professors and student life, both scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and accommodation are also strong at 4, with location and value close behind at 4.5. Internationality also scores a respectable 4. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering, with professors and student experience standing out as key strengths.

With location being the standout positive, this university also received strong marks for its professors and value. Student life, facilities, and internationality were rated moderately. The weakest area identified in the survey was accommodation. Overall, the university presents a mixed but generally favorable picture, with clear strengths and one notable area for improvement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (98 out of 99) reviews are positive, with students praising excellent faculty, strong mentorship, engaging instruction, and useful course material. They also highlight good amenities and an inclusive environment. No negative feedback was reported.

Nothing to show

With one review, the average rating is 4/5 stars. The feedback praises learning experiences and career development. A minor concern was raised about the prevalence of virtual courses and high prices.

With ~90% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.08/5, students praise the university's focus on practical, tech-driven learning, international community, and collaborative environment. No negative reviews were recorded.

Reviews indicate a positive university experience (~100% positive sentiment). Students appreciate personalized attention from helpful, approachable faculty and a welcoming atmosphere. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.

Approximately 64% of reviews are positive, highlighting competent professors, a good educational process, and a positive atmosphere. The average rating is 3.91/5, with about 9% of feedback being negative and mentioning theory-based education without practical projects.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
0%
0%
18%
0%
36%
60%
4★
30%
0%
100%
72%
100%
27%
40%
3★
1%
0%
0%
10%
0%
27%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best IT university in Russia

Knowledge and study here are very good and professors are professionals. Students life is pretty boring in the early years, but it is getting to be better thou. Here you are taught in English and professors are from all around the world. Most of the international students are from Latin countries.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close