Crandall University - CU vs University of Sunderland vs University of British Columbia vs Oulton College vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 338 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated, accessible, and supportive faculty
- +Welcoming environment and small class sizes
- +Focus on experiential and hands-on learning
- +Practical, real-world focused curriculum and skills
- +Supportive and dedicated instructors and learning environment
- +International exposure and English-taught programs
- +Excellent academics and experienced faculty
- +Valuable career preparation and practical learning
- +Great campus resources and vibrant student life
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Small class sizes and strong teacher connections
- +Welcoming campus environment and diversity
- +Numerous opportunities for involvement and growth
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and poorly structured.
- -Insufficient lecturers and feeling left behind in the course.
- -Administrative and course selection issues are a significant frustration.
- -Some professors and classes are subpar, with arbitrary grading.
- -Social experiences outside of clubs can be disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Lack of clear communication and responsiveness from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Inconsistent and ineffective teaching quality.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Across various aspects, the university garners strong ratings. Its professors and student life are particularly well-regarded, both scoring above 4.27. Accommodation and internationality also receive high marks. The weakest area appears to be location, with a rating of 3.89, though facilities are also relatively lower compared to other categories. Overall, the university presents a solid profile with notable strengths in academic and social experiences.
Facilities and professors stand out as the university's strongest assets, receiving the highest marks. Student life and location also scored well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Accommodation, however, received the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Internationality and value were rated moderately, reflecting a generally positive but not exceptional standing.
This institution demonstrates a commendable performance across several key areas. Its strongest suit is location, achieving a high rating of 4.45. Student life and internationality also receive positive marks, both above 4.3. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.86. Other aspects like facilities, professors, and value fall within a solid range, generally around the 4.0 to 4.2 mark.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both receiving a near-perfect 4.67. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded at 4.0, with **Value** also earning a solid 4.0. Areas showing the most room for growth include **Professors** and **Accommodations**, both averaging around 3.67.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~95%), highlighting instructors' dedication and accessibility, smaller class sizes, and a welcoming Christian environment. Experiential learning and strong faculty support are also frequently praised. No negative reviews were reported.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 64 reviews, ~84% are positive, praising practical, UK-standard curricula and supportive lecturers. A single negative review (~1.6%) mentioned insufficient lecturers and unmet course expectations.
With ~83% positive reviews, students praise demanding academics, supportive resources, and career preparation. A small minority note challenges with course selection and professor engagement.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
With a 3.67 average rating, ~67% of feedback is positive. Students praise small class sizes, strong teacher connections, convenient campus location, and a welcoming, diverse atmosphere with good administrative opportunities.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
One of the things I would most like to discuss is Crandall University's instructors' willingness to go above and beyond to help us succeed. They are always accessible to answer our questions and provide us with wise counsel, whether it is during office hours, online, or even after class. Their dedication to our academic growth is tremendously motivating. They create a friendly environment in the classroom where children feel comfortable sharing their thoughts and asking for help. This not only fosters a sense of belonging and community, but it also facilitates meaningful conversations and peer learning.
Nothing to show
I was there as an exchange student from Europe, attending classes at Sauder Business School and the Mechanical Engineering Department. Studying at UBC is definitely a mixed bag in terms of the quality of education. I did have a few great professors who held wonderfully challenging and well-thought-out classes, making me feel that UBC punches above its weight in terms of educational quality. However, some other lectures were undoubtedly subpar. Grading seemed quite arbitrary at times (moving goalposts seems to be a recurring theme at UBC), and the lectures were not nearly as good as they should have been, in my opinion. It is quite fair to say that other exchange students and I were often shocked that UBC allows these courses to occur annually without making efforts to improve them. At UBC as a whole, less is expected from students than at my home university. I've seen people never show up to class and hold presentations that would never fly at my home uni. Professors seems to welcome all questions even if they are about things a fourth-year engineering student just months before graduation needs to know. I am not sure if UBC ensures that its graduates are adequately educated, and would definitely think twice if I was a recruiter and had to hire someone who attented there. From what I have seen, I would tentatively recommend Sauder Business School. For Mechanical Engineering (and probably also Electrical and Civil Engineering), UBC is simply too small, offering a lack of choices and not many lectures; usually, only introductory courses are offered for most topics. I recommend attending a more engineering/science-focused university, such as Waterloo or others in the US or Europe. It is quite astonishing how much money people pay to attend these subpar classes. Enjoyed having a beach on campus.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
