ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO vs Escuela Europea de Negocios vs Universidad de Oviedo vs Neuro Business School - NBS
Side-by-side comparison from 151 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive, intense, and up-to-date academic programs with practical application
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth beyond academics, including leadership and diverse experiences
- +Strong career support, excellent placements, and networking opportunities
- +Practical, industry-connected curriculum
- +Expert lecturers with real-world experience
- +Supportive professor-student relationships
- +Renowned university status and societal impact
- +Welcoming and fulfilling study abroad experience
- +Excellent teaching structure
- +Excellent professors and teaching quality
- +Good academic environment and supportive staff
- +High-quality and comprehensive curriculum
- +Practical, creative, and engaging learning approach
- +Inspiring and supportive teachers with real-world business insights
- +Strong academic programs with global perspectives
- +Teacher dedication and real-world focus
- +Integrated and close learning environment
- +Growing campus and accessible transportation
- +Practical, project-based learning with real-world application
- +Strong professional network and career preparation
- +Supportive faculty and international environment
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor handling of financial matters and logistical challenges.
- -Lack of focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Negative social environment and perceived unfair financial practices.
- -Incompetent and unprofessional leadership and management.
- -Poor quality of instruction due to unqualified staff.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common source of frustration.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Lack of practical relevance in curriculum and insufficient support for thesis completion.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student progress and degree attainment.
- -Poor value for money regarding class hours.
- -Disappointing overall experience not meeting expectations.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from administration
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities
- -Overcrowded classes and insufficient resources
- -Poor communication and disorganization from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Uninspiring teaching methods and irrelevant curriculum.
Performance across key university metrics shows varied strengths. Professors receive the highest marks, followed closely by value and internationality. Student life and location also score well. The university's weakest areas are facilities and accommodation, though both still achieve respectable scores.
Across various aspects, the university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in accommodation, which received the highest rating. Facilities, professors, and location also scored well, indicating solid foundational strengths. Student life and internationality received comparatively lower marks, suggesting areas where enhancements could be considered. Overall, the university presents a positive evaluation with a clear standout in its living arrangements.
Receiving outstanding marks, this institution excels particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Location also stand out with a strong 4. The university's weakest, though still highly positive, area lies in its Facilities and Location, which, while good, did not reach the perfect score achieved in other key aspects.
Evaluations reveal a university with a consistently solid performance across multiple aspects. The location stands out as the strongest area, achieving a high rating of 4.25. On the other hand, accommodation received the lowest score at 3.64. Other areas such as professors, student life, internationality, and value all fall within a competitive range, suggesting a generally positive student experience.
The institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its internationality, with a notable 4.79 rating. Professors also receive high marks at 4.74, and value for money is strong at 4.68. Areas for potential improvement include location and accommodation, both rated at 4.375, representing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent feedback, particularly excelling in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Internationality** also stands out with a top rating. Conversely, **Location** is the weakest point, scoring a moderate three. Other aspects like Professors, Accommodation, and Value are rated positively at a solid four.
Remarkable scores are evident across most surveyed aspects of this university. Professors and location stand out as exceptionally strong areas, both scoring near perfect marks. Student life and facilities also received very high praise. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, though it still maintains a respectable rating. Internationality and value for money are also well-regarded.
~92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, a supportive environment, and practical learning opportunities. The remaining ~8% of feedback mentions concerns about value and IT infrastructure.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 17 reviews, ~76% of feedback is positive, highlighting practical learning, professional lecturers, and personal professor relationships. A small amount of negative feedback (~6%) points to poor management and unprofessionalism.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlighted their rewarding acceptance, a welcoming atmosphere, and excellent teaching structure.
Nearly 94% of reviews are positive, highlighting diverse and comprehensive curricula, excellent professors, and good facilities. A small portion of negative feedback points to lack of support for final projects and overly theoretical coursework.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting engaging, creative learning with practical projects and inspiring teachers. A small percentage of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with the value of full-time programs.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. Approximately 100% of feedback is positive, highlighting good teacher-student relationships and real-world focused teaching.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97% 4-5 stars), highlighting valuable technical knowledge, practical learning, and professional network development. No negative feedback was provided.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This University claims for international excellence but the reality is very different. Precarity, bad and old fashioned teachers, no accuracy to law or their own institutions. Student rights that are disappeared or bad quality on the practical subjects.
The classes are so intresting I love how they they teach you about psychology and business strategy, I really like how the teachers are real professionals in terms of marketing , buisness... overall I really enjoy it.
Nothing to show
I enjoyed this programe, academically is it similar to other programs in other cities but it offers so much more. The personal connection with professors, strong guidance for future career and the international network is what separates it from other options!
