Paulista University - UNIP vs International School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Ironhack vs Universidade Veiga de Almeida
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and attentive staff
- +Modern campus and great facilities
- +Encouraging student treatment and support
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
- +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
- +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- +Exceptional academic education and impactful student experience
- +Valuable professional networking and lasting friendships
- +Rewarding course and career path satisfaction
Nothing to show
- +Highly qualified professors with real-world experience
- +Exceptional educational structure and knowledge
- +Numerous opportunities for development
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a persistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
- -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and not aligned with current industry needs.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major problem.
- -Limited course options and lack of essential resources are deeply disappointing.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and clear communication cause dissatisfaction.
With excellent scores in several key areas, this university shines particularly in its **professors**, receiving a near-perfect 4.79, closely followed by its **location** at 4.64. **Student life** and **value** also rate well at 4.21. The university's **internationality** stands as its weakest point, with a rating of 3.64, while **facilities** and **accommodation** are rated solidly at 4.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Performance for this university shows a clear strength in academic and social aspects. Professors and student life both received excellent ratings of 4.5. Value for money also stands out with a high score of 4.5. Conversely, facilities and location received the lowest scores at 3, indicating these areas may be opportunities for improvement, while accommodation and internationality fall in the middle range.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution garners excellent reviews, with perfect scores in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Value**. Facilities are also highly regarded, scoring an impressive 4.67. Areas for potential improvement include Student Life, Accommodation, and Internationality, all of which received a solid but slightly lower rating of 4.33.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, ~81% are positive. Students praise modern facilities, convenient campus location, and supportive, helpful professors. No negative reviews were provided.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, all feedback is positive. Students highlight gaining valuable academic knowledge, broadened horizons, and forming lasting friendships, while acknowledging administrative and pricing concerns.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight exceptional professors with extensive experience and exemplary teaching methods, leading to great opportunities. Some mention numerous extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
