University of Wroclaw - UWr vs Graduate School for Social Research - GSSR vs Cracow University of Technology - PK vs Vincent Pol University - VPU vs Wyższa Szkoła Biznesu - National Louis University - WSB-NLU
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality education and excellent professors
- +Valuable practical experience and research opportunities
- +Enjoyable student life in a beautiful city
- +High-quality teaching and respected professors
- +Engaging academic content and insightful thinkers
- +Well-organized courses and prepared materials
- +Practical and up-to-date courses with opportunities for hands-on learning
- +Passionate and helpful professors with real-world experience
- +Friendly environment fostering personal and academic growth
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
- +Engaging and relevant academic experience with supportive professors.
- +Strong career preparation and employer recognition.
- +Student-friendly environment with numerous activities and support.
- +Supportive and accessible professors and staff.
- +Small class sizes and individual attention.
- +Fresh and promising educational paths, practical focus
- +Specialization options in Psychology
- +Ministry approval and unified master's degree structure
- -Outdated facilities and underfunding are a significant issue.
- -Course content is often irrelevant for students with a relevant BA.
- -Program lacks promised opportunities beyond specific career paths.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently disliked.
- -Lack of resources, including technology and learning materials, is a significant complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and delivery are often seen as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
- -Administrative and management issues create confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of essential resources, like books and adequate study spaces, is a significant problem.
- -Ineffective administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of clarity on important information are recurring problems.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -They are unhappy with outdated facilities and poor course structure.
- -Students find the cost of tuition to be too high for the value received.
This university garners strong feedback across several key areas. The location stands out as the highest-rated aspect, achieving a score of 4.8. Professors also received excellent marks, with a rating of 4.45. Accommodation represents the lowest score among the surveyed categories at 4.01. Overall, student life, facilities, and internationality also received favorable ratings between 4.1 and 4.2.
Across all surveyed categories, the university has received consistent ratings of zero. This indicates no discernible strengths or weaknesses in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, or value. The uniform scores suggest a lack of significant positive or negative attributes in any area evaluated.
This university receives excellent marks in several key areas, particularly Internationality and Value, both scoring a high 4.31. Facilities and Student Life are also very strong, averaging 4.27. Professors and Location are well-regarded at 4.06 and 4.17 respectively. The weakest area, though still solid, is Accomodation at a 4.0 rating.
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with particularly outstanding scores in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both achieving a perfect 5. Accommodation and Internationality also stand out at 4.8. The weakest area, though still strong, is **Location** at 4.4, with Professors and Value also scoring well at 4.6.
This institution achieves exceptional scores, particularly in **Professors**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect marks. Areas like **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. No significant weaknesses are identified in this rating set, indicating a well-rounded and highly regarded academic environment.
This institution shines with perfect scores in Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation, indicating a well-rounded and engaging environment. Facilities and Internationality also receive commendable ratings. The sole area not achieving the highest mark is Facilities, scoring a still-strong four out of five, suggesting room for minor improvements in this aspect. Overall, the university presents an excellent offering.
With a 4.37/5 average, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality education, engaged professors, practical opportunities, and the city. A small percentage (~4%) mention disappointment with specific course content and limited opportunities in some programs.
With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent professors and high-quality content, though some note outdated management and poor funding.
With 14 out of 17 reviews being positive (~82%), students praise practical, up-to-date courses and a friendly, supportive environment. Professors and staff are described as helpful and passionate.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
All five reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 5/5. Students praise well-structured programs, knowledgeable professors, and engaging coursework, highlighting academic development and career preparation. The university fosters a welcoming environment with ample student activities and support.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for professors' dedication and helpful staff, fostering individualized attention in small groups. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. This indicates strong satisfaction among students with the Psychology program.
As a current master's student in the Communication Management program at the University of Wroclaw, I can confidently say that this journey has been one of the most enriching experiences of my life, not only academically, but also personally and professionally. 1. Global opportunities through Erasmus+: During my time here, I’ve joined two short-term BIP exchange programs in Spain and Romania (with a generous grant), and have a one-year exchange in Germany. These experiences have allowed me to meet peers from across Europe, learn in diverse settings, and grow both culturally and intellectually. 2. Serious research, strong support: I’m currently representing our Institute in a Monography research project of UWr, a valuable opportunity to engage deeply with academic work and collaborate with professors in a meaningful way. The opportunity is open for all students who wanna pursue an academic path. 3. Supportive and passionate faculty: The professors are not only knowledgeable but also truly approachable. In the first semester, I approached my professor for guidance on career path, research opportunities, and expressed my interest. She shared insightful experiences, motivated and encouraged me a lot. And she nominated me for the Monography research project under her supervision, and I got the opportunity. I'm grateful, honestly. 4. Practice-oriented learning: Unlike many programs that are heavy on theory, this one focuses on real-world projects, case studies, and group work - ideal for master's-level students who want to build practical skills for the workplace. Actually, I don't face much study pressure, I enjoy the courses. 5. International Office that really cares: The International Office team is incredibly helpful. During the application process, I was surprised that they always responded to my email inquiries quickly and helped me resolve any issues. When I study here, from paperworks support to academic/exchange activities, they are always ready to assist and create a welcoming environment for students from all over the world. 6. Peaceful lifestyle & affordable living: Wroclaw is a charming, student-friendly city with a mix of history and modernity. The cost of living is reasonable, making it accessible for many international students without compromising on quality of life. I travelled to many cities in European countries, but Wroclaw is one of the most peaceful and affordable cities. Although the English skills of the city officers are limited, they always try to support by using Google Translate or finding support people. Studying at the University of Wroclaw has opened doors I never imagined: from international networks to research, from personal growth to professional clarity. If you're looking for an educational experience that truly takes you beyond the classroom, this could be your next big step. I appreciate this experience and believe that this is a worthy step to open up many opportunities to explore the world!
I have found great thinkers among both students and lecturers. I have enjoyed some courses more than I took pleasure in others, but that is solely due to my increased interest and the preference I hold for theory, especially social and cultural, whereby my greatest pleasure must have been meeting and partaking in classes held by professor Slawomir Kapralski whom I hold in highest respect. The classes are well-ordered and organized, the material is prepared and provided, the professors are attentive, kind and prompt in their correspondence - no less is the case when it comes to the correspondence one seeks in the support that the dean or the rest of the faculty staff will be willing to provide.
Nothing to show
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
