Universidad de Huelva vs BEET Language Centre vs Florida International University - FIU vs International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC vs Lakeland Community College

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC (5.00)
Universidad de Huelva: wins 0/5 categories
BEET Language Centre: wins 0/5 categories
Florida International University - FIU: wins 3/5 categories
International Scientific Educational Centre NAS RA - ISEC: wins 2/5 categories
Lakeland Community College: wins 0/5 categories
Sultan Agung Islamic University: wins 0/5 categories
Edo State University Iyamho: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Literature
Bournemouth, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Miami, Florida, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
61 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Physics
Kirtland, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
Not rated
4.51
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
3.25
Not rated
4.39
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
3.75
Not rated
4.44
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.00
Not rated
4.54
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
3.25
Not rated
4.24
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
3.25
Not rated
4.52
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
Accommodation
3.00
Not rated
4.20
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming and accessible environment
  • +Attentive and close teaching staff
  • +Good facilities and resources

Nothing to show

  • +Vibrant cultural diversity and friendly people
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Convenient and flexible learning options
  • +Research opportunities and advanced degrees
  • +Distance learning flexibility
  • +Wide range of specializations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive lecturers and focused learning environments
  • +Quality facilities and effective teaching
  • +Vibrant student life and extracurricular activities
Cons
  • -Outdated and insufficient facilities for sports and general use.
  • -Poor teaching quality due to language barriers and ineffective delivery.
  • -Lack of basic amenities like heating and inadequate organizational structure.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching methods and unclear expectations frustrate students.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant concern.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Inconsistent and poor quality instruction negatively impacts the learning experience.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a solid average across several aspects, with its strongest area being **Professors**, earning a respectable 3.75. Areas such as Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality represent the weakest points, all receiving a rating of 3. Location, Student Life, and Value fall within a middle tier, indicating moderate satisfaction.

Nothing to show

Overall, the university demonstrates strong performance across multiple areas, with **Internationality** standing out at 4.54, closely followed by **Value** (4.52) and **Facilities** (4.51). **Professors** also received a high rating at 4.44. The **weakest area** is **Student Life**, scoring 4.24, just below **Accomodation** at 4.2. **Location** remains a solid performer at 4.39.

An overwhelmingly positive evaluation is presented, with the institution achieving perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, and Location. Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality are also strong, each receiving a commendable rating of 4. Value for money is similarly rated as excellent. The institution's primary strengths lie in its exceptional facilities, faculty, and prime location, while areas like student engagement and housing are rated very well, indicating a consistently high standard across most aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its **facilities** and **professors**, both receiving perfect scores. **Student life** and **internationality** are also rated positively. Conversely, **location** and **accommodation** present the most significant areas for improvement, scoring moderately. The overall **value** is strong, reflecting a solid offering with room for enhancement in specific practical aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

About 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming atmosphere, good services, and attentive staff. Around 25% of feedback mentioned poor facilities and organization issues. The average rating is 3.5/5.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.46/5 from 61 reviews, students praise diversity and friendly faculty/peers. The university's vibrant culture and convenient online programs are also frequently highlighted.

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, this university has overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students appreciate opportunities for research involvement and the flexibility of distance learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With 100% positive feedback, Edo State University is praised for its academic quality, supportive lecturers, and conducive environment. However, mandatory on-campus accommodation for undergraduates is a significant drawback.

Rating distribution
5★
25%
0%
49%
100%
0%
0%
0%
4★
25%
0%
48%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
25%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Completely unorganized

My experience as an Erasmus student was not that good. Starting from the teachers, they are supposed to teach in English but they just don't know the language very well, that is why the performance is poor as well as what arrives to the student in terms of study content. To follow with the complete lack of heating system in all the buildings except for the library (where the people who don't use laptops like to occupy the only few spots with sockets). The organization is very poor, it will very often happen that a communication of a canceled class will not be done, having you waking up early in the morning to find out there was not class that day, not to count that 1 hour and half spent on the bus to go and come back from the university (if you live in La Merced and don't have a bike, which would easily get stolen after 2 days after the purchase).

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close