Universidad Arturo Michelena - UAM vs Mohindra College vs University of Lahore vs Rhode Island College vs Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo

Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Arturo Michelena - UAM: wins 1/3 categories
Mohindra College: wins 0/3 categories
University of Lahore: wins 0/3 categories
Rhode Island College: wins 2/3 categories
Autonomous University of the State of Hidalgo: wins 0/3 categories
Levy Mwanawasa Medical University - LMMU: wins 0/3 categories
Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa - SNS: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Patiala, India
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Lahore, Pakistan
3.90
Read more reviews
20 reviews
×
Best programme: Civil Engineering
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: BA (hons) Psychology
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
4.16
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
Win
Not rated
3.75
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.50
Not rated
4.00
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.00
Not rated
3.60
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
3.50
Not rated
4.11
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.50
Not rated
3.90
5.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
Not rated
3.45
5.00
Win
1.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse and lively university environment
  • +Academic and professional growth opportunities
  • +Valuable skills and future prospects

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive faculty and strong theoretical foundation
  • +Access to advanced labs and practical experience
  • +Good study environment and facilities
  • +Diverse and engaging campus life
  • +Flexible online learning options
  • +Inclusive and accepting community
  • +Excellent curriculum and highly qualified professors
  • +Optimal facilities and necessary resources
  • +Calm and positive faculty atmosphere

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Inflexible and irrelevant curriculum fails to engage students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods are a significant concern.
  • -Poor facilities and maintenance, including non-functional amenities, are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a consistent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Limited opportunities for practical application and real-world skill development are a concern.
  • -Poor management and administrative support.
  • -Inadequate and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of resources and engaging learning experiences.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, notably receiving high marks for Professors (4.5) and Value (4.5). Facilities and Accomodation also score well at 4 out of 5. Student Life and Internationality are the comparatively weaker aspects, with ratings of 3.5 and 3 respectively. The Location also received a solid rating of 4.

Nothing to show

This institution receives strong marks for its **Facilities** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11). **Professors** also garnered a respectable score of 4. Areas that could be improved include **Accomodation** (3.45) and **Internationality** (3.6). Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with some standout strengths.

This institution excels in numerous aspects, achieving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. These areas represent its strongest performance. The university's location, however, received a lower rating of 3, suggesting it is the weakest area in this evaluation.

This institution receives excellent scores in several key areas, with perfect ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Student Life, as well as a strong score for Value. Its weakest point is Accommodations, which is rated significantly lower than other aspects. Location and Internationality are rated moderately.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, university reviews highlight a diverse and lively environment, with students appreciating academic and professional growth opportunities. Negative feedback is minimal, with ~0% of comments being unfavorable.

Nothing to show

Approximately 75% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive departments, research focus, and good study environments. A small portion (~10%) notes issues like outdated curriculum and poor facilities.

Based on one review, the university is rated 5/5. The student highlighted a great campus with many activities and a variety of psychology class options. They also praised the creative, accepting student body.

With one review, the university has a perfect 5/5 average rating. The single positive comment highlighted excellent curriculum and professors, along with optimal facilities and a calm atmosphere. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
35%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
40%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
15%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close