Tecnológico Nacional de México vs Loyola University Maryland vs St George's University of London vs Creative Design School vs University American College Skopje - UACS
Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and relevant curriculum.
- +Dedicated and supportive faculty.
- +Opportunities for practical experience and engaging activities.
- +Engaging professors and quality education.
- +Inclusive and diverse learning environment.
- +Accommodating learning modalities.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty, strong learning environment
- +Excellent practical experience, real-world applications, and career opportunities
- +High-quality facilities and unique, comprehensive communication skills training
- +Flexible scheduling and ability to tailor projects
- +Comprehensive content and portfolio building
- +Personalized one-to-one tutor support and mentorship
- +Supportive and helpful staff
- +Interactive classes and efficient teaching materials
- +Emphasis on practical application through projects
- +Flexible online programs and self-paced learning
- +Supportive and accessible tutors and lecturers
- +Scholarships and affordability
- +Theory and practical skill integration
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Stimulating and relevant coursework
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a major complaint.
- -Administrative & management issues cause constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring concern.
- -A lack of support and resources leaves students feeling neglected.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum is seen as outdated and lacking practical relevance.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Excessive and confusing administrative processes cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and limited support for students are frequently mentioned.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful administrative and management staff.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution.
- -Low quality of studies and lack of acquired knowledge.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration for students.
This institution receives exceptional ratings in several key areas. Student life and location are particularly strong, both achieving a perfect score of 5. Internationality, professors, and facilities are also highly regarded, with a 4.5 rating. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, scoring 3.5, though it remains a positive rating. Overall, the university presents a very strong profile with excellent offerings in most aspects.
This institution excels in several key areas, earning perfect scores for facilities, professors, and value. However, significant drawbacks are evident in accommodation, receiving the lowest rating. The university also scores low for location and internationality, and student life presents a moderate aspect.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in its **Professors** and **Value** ratings, both at an excellent 4.44. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive strong marks, around 4.2. **Internationality** mirrors the student life score. The **Location** is rated moderately well at 3.78, while **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.63.
This institution garners universal praise, achieving perfect scores across all evaluated aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates exceptional strength in every area with no identified weaknesses, presenting a comprehensively outstanding university experience.
This institution presents a mixed review, with its strongest showings in Facilities and Student Life, both scoring a respectable 3. Professors also received a positive rating at 3.4. However, the Location stands out as the weakest aspect, earning a low 1.75. Accommodations also received a lower score of 2. Overall, the university demonstrates a mid-range performance with notable highs and lows in specific areas.
This institution garners high marks across most evaluated aspects. Its **location** stands out as a perfect 5, indicating exceptional appeal in this area. Student life and facilities also receive strong ratings, with 4.6 and 4.8 respectively. The weakest areas, though still positive, are **accommodation** and **internationality**, both rated at 4, and professors and value, which are rated at approximately 4.14.
This institution presents a solid academic offering, with professors and overall value receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in accommodation, which received the lowest rating, with student life and internationality being mid-range.
All 3 reviews are positive, resulting in a 5/5 average rating. Students praised the academic programs, dedicated teachers, and relevant curriculum.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback is positive, with ~100% of reviews being favorable and ~0% expressing dissatisfaction.
Most reviews are positive (~78%), highlighting excellent faculty support, strong real-world applications, and practical experience, particularly in healthcare. Some minor administrative issues were noted.
All 12 reviews are positive, with students praising flexibility, one-to-one tutor support, and portfolio development. The average rating is 5/5.
With ~60% positive feedback, students highlight supportive staff and interactive classes with concise materials and projects. One review found studies too fast with little effort, recommending against it.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~86% of student reviews are positive, highlighting superb education, supportive tutors, and flexible online programs. A small amount of negative feedback (~14%) cites concerns about study quality.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting challenging yet rewarding academics, knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and practical learning. Accommodation availability is a minor concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Creative Design School (CDS) could not have been a more perfect fit for my plan to embark on a career change to graphic design. The key factors that lead to me enrolling on their Graphic Design Level 2 course was the flexibility of the course (allowing me to work full-time whilst studying), the reasonable course fee and a friendly, no-pressure Skype with the school to explain my situation and see if this would work for me. The course covers the key principles of graphic design and each module presents real-life scenario tasks that build up your portfolio while learning at the same time. I've surprised myself at how my skills have developed as I complete each module. The real bonus to studying with CDS is the amazing 1-to-1 tuition. My tutor, Pete, is always on hand to help, support and encourage me to push my creative boundaries. Having dedicated, personal tuition from someone with such knowledge of the industry is priceless. I would highly recommend this course and studying with CDS in general. I've enjoyed and gained so much from this course that I've already signed up to the Visual Communications course.
Sometimes unorganized, but very good professor-student support. Some of the professors don't know fluent English and it is sometimes hard to understand the class that they are teaching. Good and understandable grading methods in general.
the education and support given is superb. They have tutor on standby to help. The facilities and the online education is top class, actually world class. I was very impressed with how the lecturers are supportive also
The university is the number one in both theories and practice and social work as a program fits well is this moment when the human kind needs support in their welfare now than before and the university has it all. The lecturers in the department were very helpful and friendly and it's blended with practicum where we were sent in various agencies and institutions to practice what we learnt in class for the full semester