Universidad Cristiana de las Asambleas de Dios - UCAD vs Chitkara University vs Escola d’Art i Superior de Disseny de les Illes Balears vs Poznan University of Medical Sciences - PUMS vs Vincent Pol University - VPU
Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Positive and supportive study environment
- +Helpful and cooperative students and teachers
- +Excellent academic quality and diverse programs.
- +Supportive staff and conducive learning environment.
- +Strong infrastructure, facilities, and extracurricular opportunities.
- +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
- +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
- +Practical training and hospital exposure
- +Supportive and clear teaching methods
- +International community and global career opportunities
- +Welcoming and supportive academic environment with approachable and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Diverse and international student body with accessible English-taught programs.
- +Practical learning opportunities and personalized attention in engaging discussions.
Nothing to show
- +Theory and practical skill integration
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Stimulating and relevant coursework
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
- -Lack of support and feeling overwhelmed by workload.
- -Subpar education quality and uninterested professors.
- -Outdated teaching methods and disengagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause student stress.
- -Inconsistent curriculum and poor lecturer English proficiency hinder learning.
- -Difficulty in receiving promised refunds and poor communication from administration.
- -Lack of preparation for future careers due to teaching methods.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unhelpful instructors are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration for students.
This institution presents a uniform rating of zero across all surveyed categories. Consequently, there are no standout strengths or discernible weaknesses to highlight. The university's performance is consistently low in areas such as facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. This suggests a critical need for comprehensive review and improvement across every facet of the university experience.
This university garners high marks for student life, with a rating of 4.45, and facilities also score well at 4.23. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.58. Other aspects like professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a respectable mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside commendable strengths.
This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality**, which stands out as its strongest area. Location also receives a high rating, indicating positive aspects in these regards. Areas for potential improvement, based on the provided data, include Facilities, Professors, and Value, all receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately well.
The university garners solid marks across most areas, with Location standing out as a significant strength. Internationality and Professors also received favorable reviews. Conversely, Accomodation was rated the weakest, suggesting room for improvement in that specific aspect. Other categories like Facilities, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution presents a solid academic offering, with professors and overall value receiving particularly high marks. Facilities and location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in accommodation, which received the lowest rating, with student life and internationality being mid-range.
With one review, the average rating is 4/5. The feedback highlights a positive study environment and helpful interactions between students and teachers.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising quality education, good infrastructure, and facilities. A small ~6% express dissatisfaction with education quality and teaching methods.
With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, praising development opportunities, practical training, and supportive staff. About 11% of feedback mentions organizational issues like overlapping classes and exams.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable lecturers, a welcoming and diverse environment, and good learning standards. A smaller portion of feedback (~12%) mentions issues with curriculum adherence, financial transparency, and lecturer communication.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting challenging yet rewarding academics, knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and practical learning. Accommodation availability is a minor concern.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Honestly, my love for medicine is what keeps me here. Going to a school in a different country you have to adapt to different customs and ways of doing things which is very different to how things are run in my home country. My issue with this school is the organisation, sometimes classes overlap, sometimes exams overlap with classes and students have to sort this out themselves, which should not be happening. Timetabling and exams shouldn't be the students' responsibility medicine are stressful as it is. As I said this is how things are run in this country.
I want to share our experience about studying at VPU. I hope this review will help somebody not to make a mistake. My daughter studied there from October 2023 to May 2024 – Beauty Science faculty, in English. She decided not to continue her studies at the University due to a number of reasons: 1. The curriculum is not followed. The semester classes indicated in it did not coincide with those taught in the daughter’s group. 2. Classes according to the plan were supposed to begin on October 9, 2023, the 1st lesson was held only on October 16. Only 3 classes per week were held from the 16th to the end of October. There were no classes at all during the first week of November. 3. We were promised that all classes specified in the program would be carried out in full. But actually, teachers were regularly late for classes and finished the classes ahead of schedule. The 3 or 4 hours stated in the schedule lasted 1.5 or 2 hours. 4. The medical examination for students wasn’t carried out in full, although practical classes with cosmetology procedures and manipulations were conducted. 5. The University offers only 1 educational institution under the Erasmus program for the Beauty science faculty. My daughter independently found and contacted a number of universities with similar programs. Five of them agreed to accept her under the Erasmus program, but this required entering into partnership agreements. She provided information to the Erasmus program coordinator at Vincent Pol University with contacts and correspondence. But even then, no agreement has been concluded with any of the universities. 6. Not a single experiment was carried out during practical classes in the subjects of perfumery and biochemistry, since there were no reagents. 7. Even though the University considers itself as practically oriented it’s not true. The beauty salons in Lublin don’t want to recruit students for practice. The University offers 2 salons which are ready to recruit students but it turns out that they just sign the documents to confirm the completion of the practice and don’t teach students anything. 8. The administration of the University promises to resolve the problems. But nothing changes. To sum up: the University is not interested in its students’ knowledge. If you just wish to buy a diploma – it’s the right place. If you are interested in getting knowledge, skills and experience – NOT.
Nothing to show
The university is the number one in both theories and practice and social work as a program fits well is this moment when the human kind needs support in their welfare now than before and the university has it all. The lecturers in the department were very helpful and friendly and it's blended with practicum where we were sent in various agencies and institutions to practice what we learnt in class for the full semester
