SKEMA Business School vs Huntington University vs Schiller International University vs Flatiron School vs Data Science Dojo
Side-by-side comparison from 190 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Industry-focused learning with practical skills and career opportunities
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Quality of teaching and faculty expertise
- +Inclusive and supportive campus environment
- +Engaging extracurriculars and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and student well-being support
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong job placement and career support
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Flexible and responsive teaching approach
- +(No other recurring positive themes beyond professor-related ones in the provided text)
- -Administrative and management issues with communication, exam, and results handling.
- -Perceived focus on financial gain over student welfare and education.
- -Unhelpful or discriminatory faculty and poor academic program organization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Teaching quality is inconsistent, with some instructors lacking engagement.
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
Nothing to show
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently problematic.
- -Insufficient communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
- -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and lacking in practical relevance.
This institution garners strong evaluations, particularly in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also receive commendable marks, all exceeding 4.1. **Value** sits just above 4.0. The area with the lowest score is **Accomodation**, averaging 3.59.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Value** and **Professors**, receiving the highest marks in these areas. **Student Life** and **Accomodation** also score well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest aspect, with the lowest rating. The remaining categories, including **Location** and **Internationality**, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential development.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
This institution exhibits a highly uneven rating profile. The standout area is undoubtedly the quality of professors, which received a perfect score. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all garnered zero ratings, indicating significant shortcomings in these aspects. Internationality and value for money are moderately positive, scoring a 3 and a 4 respectively, suggesting these are areas of relative strength compared to the weakest categories.
Approximately 97.5% of reviews are positive, praising opportunities, industry links, and diverse student life. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and communication.
All eight reviews are positive, averaging 4.13/5 stars. Students highlight diversity, well-organized extracurriculars, and a supportive learning environment with skilled professors and counselors. No negative feedback was provided.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
This university receives strong positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being positive. Students praise knowledgeable and accommodating professors. A minor point of improvement mentioned relates to administrative rigidity.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
Nothing to show
