Universidad del Cauca - UNICAUCA vs Texas A&M - TAMU vs Flagler College vs University of Economics in Bratislava vs American University of Malta
Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
Nothing to show
- +Strong community and connections
- +Quality academics and professors
- +Abundant activities and traditions
- +Passionate and knowledgeable professors.
- +Abundant networking and workshop opportunities.
- +Wide program selection in the capital.
- +Progressive teaching methods used by some instructors.
- +Business Management program valued for practical usefulness.
- +Engaging professors and diverse extracurricular activities
- +Affordable on-campus accommodation
- +Pleasant campus environment
- +Dedicated, supportive lecturers
- +Conducive learning environment
- +Technological advancements and innovation
- +Effective learning and teaching methods
- +Supportive and helpful instructors
- +Engaging and useful course content
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and course structure causes confusion.
- -Disorganized administration and poor facilities management are common frustrations.
- -Unwelcoming student body and lack of social activities contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Concerns exist about credit transferability and the overall value for money.
- -Unengaging and outdated academic content.
- -Lack of practical application and international opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues indicate a focus on profit over education.
- -Lack of qualified professors and frequent staff changes disrupt learning.
- -Poor student life and disrespectful, unprofessional staff are significant problems.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication with staff and instructors is frequently poor.
- -Incompetent professors and subpar education.
- -Disorganized administration and bureaucratic issues.
- -Irrelevant curriculum and contradictory information.
Nothing to show
This institution is highly regarded across several key areas, excelling particularly in Student Life (4.45) and Value (4.42). Internationality also received a strong score (4.32). The university demonstrates good performance in Facilities (4.26) and Professors (4.26), with Accomodation also scoring well (4.1). Location, while still positive, is the weakest rated aspect among the surveyed categories (3.84).
This university demonstrates strengths in its **Location**, achieving a notable 4.6 rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are identified as areas for improvement, both receiving a 3. Ratings are also solid for Professors (4) and Value (3.8), while Accomodation (3.4) and Internationality (3) fall within a moderate range.
Performance is particularly strong in location, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation and internationality represent areas needing significant improvement, indicated by lower scores. Overall, the university presents a mixed profile with average ratings in facilities, professors, student life, and value.
This institution presents a mixed bag of ratings. Its strongest area is **Location**, receiving a respectable 3.67. In contrast, **Facilities** stand out as a clear weakness, scoring a low 1. Other areas, including Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and Value, fall into the mid-range with scores around 2.33. Accommodation also scores on the lower side at 2.
This institution receives strong marks across the board, with particularly high scores for Facilities and Professors, both at 4.5. Student Life and Accommodation are also well-regarded, scoring 4.4 and 4.44 respectively. Internationality is rated at 4.3, while the Location stands out as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.1. Overall, the university presents a robust offering with excellent academic and student experience components.
Performance across various aspects of this institution shows a mixed picture. The strongest areas are Location and Accommodations, as well as Internationality and Value, all receiving a rating of approximately 2.67. Conversely, Facilities and Student Life are identified as weaker areas, both scoring a 2. The quality of Professors also sits in the middle, with a rating of 2.33.
Nothing to show
With ~86% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise strong professor and peer connections, a friendly community, and the Aggie Network. Some mention needing to actively search for assistance. No 1-2 star reviews were present.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 20% of reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable professors and networking opportunities. However, about 40% express dissatisfaction with dorms, food, campus culture, and disorganization.
Reviews are split, with a 3/5 average rating. Approximately 50% of feedback is negative, highlighting a need for modernized teaching and more practical, international projects. Positive comments mention the capital location and program variety.
With an average rating of 2.33/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is predominantly negative (~67%). Concerns include a perceived "money grab" scheme, unqualified professors, and a lack of professionalism from staff. One positive review highlighted exciting experiences, friendly staff, and affordable accommodation.
Students consistently praise Murang'a University of Technology for its dedicated and supportive lecturers who facilitate timely syllabus completion. They also highlight the clean, safe, and vibrant campus environment with strong technological investment, contributing to quality education.
All three university reviews are negative, with an average rating of 1.67 out of 5. Students describe the institution as disorganized and the education as subpar, with incompetent professors and irrelevant study programs.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I absolutely do not recommend this place and regret giving it a chance in the first place despite all the rumours and media talk. Now I’ve seen it first hand for myself and its beyond anything an outsider can imagine. The university has clearly been setup as a scheme of a quick money grab and not for academic purposes. Almost all professors are unqualified to teach and are simply fillers which has resulted in frequent facility member changes every semester. Basic professionalism, manners, respect are not part of AUM at all. The provosts & staff members will go head to head with students by belittling and disrespecting them. They are unprofessional & disrespectful and cannot handle any questions asked with respect in regards to academic inquires. The university is run with serious homophobia and racism throughout and has gone as far as firing 2 homosexual professors. Some professors have continuously passed on racist, homophobic and sexual commentary to students on multiple occasions during lectures with little to no action taken as students feel scared to approach staff and send complaints. The class syllabus is there for decoration and is a useless piece of paper. Full presidential scholarships are given out like candy to students who do not attend or participate in classes all year around. The careless students are being pardoned by the universities founder from the sadden group as friendships are tired in between. Only a very few students with high GPAs and a high work ethic have received a well deserved full scholarships. Other students have gotten rejected every year for any scholarship application as the full scholarships are favoured to the Jordanian students since the founder is Jordanian. Students have dropped out of the “university” for its lack of professionalism and lack of experience in running an academic place. Its a circus and a fraudulent place. Under 300k euros in profit annual is made by this "international university" by sucking money from students pockets and 14.8 million euros in losses. Ex staff and professors have come forth to some students about the university's behind the scenes treatments and sketchy "plans" and operations. All social media engagement is purchased and promoted in underdeveloped countries in order to take advantage of the less fortunate by selling them fake hopes and dreams. 2019 - 2022 has been nothing short of a nightmare at AUM. If you are serious about your studies and future do not go to this place. Students including myself gave them a chance every semester for improvement and not one stone has been moved. They ask us for feedback and waste our time in meetings only to not acknowledge a thing we've said. I have very few semesters left in this place and cannot leave now unless I get the bachelor's certificate so I do not start from square one when going elsewhere to make up for lost time at this place. You will end up wasting your time, money, energy, mental, and emotional health on people who don’t know how to run anything other than their mouths. Avoid at all costs. I could go on but this is the tamest review about my university experience at AUM.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
