McGill University vs HEC Montreal vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs TAV College
Side-by-side comparison from 141 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and well-structured academic programs.
- +Dedicated and accessible professors.
- +Supportive and interactive learning environment.
- +Accessible degree pathways with flexible entry requirements
- +Rigorous, career-focused programs with strong industry connections
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world project opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
- +Teaching excellence and faculty dedication
- +Interactive and engaging learning environment
- +Personalized attention and academic success
Nothing to show
- +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
- +Supportive instructors from industry
- +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
- -Overcrowded classes and limited professor interaction.
- -Outdated curriculum and lack of real-world application in courses.
- -Unrealistic workload and emphasis on memorization.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in course content.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
University evaluations show a strong showing in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving particularly high scores. Student Life and Value also stand out positively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience, while Facilities and Professors are rated solidly in the upper range.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life and value stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving scores above 4.5. Location represents the weakest area, though still rated favorably at over 4.0. Facilities, professors, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Overall, the university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance across most surveyed aspects. It received perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. The weakest area, while still positive, is Internationality, rated at a commendable 4. This suggests a highly desirable institution with outstanding offerings in nearly every dimension, with a slight opportunity for enhanced global engagement.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.
The overwhelming majority of university students praise professors' dedication, well-structured and interactive courses, and abundant resources. A very small percentage mention overcrowded classes and a disconnect between some course content and real-world application.
Most students praise rigorous, career-focused programs that prepare them for the job market and offer practical learning. Excellent faculty and industry connections are recurring themes, with ~0% negative feedback.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
With a single review, this university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was entirely positive, highlighting teaching excellence and a dynamic learning environment.
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.
As a current student at McGill University, my experience has been incredibly rewarding both academically and personally. McGill is known for its strong international reputation, and it truly lives up to that with a diverse student body from around the world, which creates an exciting, global learning environment. The academic programs are challenging and research-driven, which pushes you to think critically and manage your time effectively. I’ve particularly appreciated the interdisciplinary opportunities, allowing me to combine Political Science, International Development, and South Asian Studies, and learn from professors who are passionate leaders in their fields. Beyond the classroom, campus life is vibrant, with countless clubs, events, and networking opportunities, plus the unique experience of living in Montréal, a city that balances culture, affordability, and excitement. If there’s one area for improvement, it would be student support services. While resources are available, they can sometimes feel stretched, especially during peak academic periods, and navigating administrative processes can be challenging. Overall, I would absolutely recommend McGill to anyone looking for a rigorous education in an inspiring, multicultural setting with strong global recognition.
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
