McGill University vs Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Université de Montréal vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs Herzing College

Side-by-side comparison from 174 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC (5.00)
McGill University: wins 2/7 categories
Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM: wins 0/7 categories
Université de Montréal: wins 0/7 categories
School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC: wins 3/7 categories
Herzing College: wins 0/7 categories
LaSalle College Montreal: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Montreal, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
106 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Accounting and Auditing
Best programme: Political Science
Best programme: Art and Design
Montreal, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
3.86
4.29
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.47
Win
Location
4.76
Win
4.54
4.15
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.13
Professors
4.29
4.25
4.29
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.27
Internationality
4.67
Win
4.06
4.09
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.87
Student life
4.55
4.20
4.06
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.20
Value
4.38
3.94
4.11
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.67
Win
Accommodation
3.92
4.13
3.79
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.33
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and well-structured academic programs.
  • +Dedicated and accessible professors.
  • +Supportive and interactive learning environment.
  • +Attentive, qualified professors with clear, practical teaching methods.
  • +Useful, in-depth education for the working world.
  • +Strong integration support for international students.
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
  • +Diverse and challenging coursework
  • +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
  • +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
  • +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
  • +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
Cons
  • -Overcrowded classes and limited professor interaction.
  • -Outdated curriculum and lack of real-world application in courses.
  • -Unrealistic workload and emphasis on memorization.
  • -Lack of adequate support and poor communication.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
  • -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
Rating summary
What students say

University evaluations show a strong showing in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving particularly high scores. Student Life and Value also stand out positively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, indicating room for improvement in this specific aspect of the university experience, while Facilities and Professors are rated solidly in the upper range.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in **Location**, which received the highest rating, and **Professors** and **Student Life**, both scoring well. Conversely, **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. The university also scores positively in **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, indicating a generally well-rounded offering.

Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.

Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The overwhelming majority of university students praise professors' dedication, well-structured and interactive courses, and abundant resources. A very small percentage mention overcrowded classes and a disconnect between some course content and real-world application.

Positive feedback (~88%) highlights attentive professors, practical skill development, and helpful staff. A small portion (~6%) of reviews mention a lack of support. The average rating is 4.29/5.

Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.

With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
47%
34%
100%
0%
0%
47%
4★
36%
41%
60%
0%
0%
0%
47%
3★
8%
6%
6%
0%
0%
0%
7%
2★
2%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
The accessibility

As a current student at McGill University, my experience has been incredibly rewarding both academically and personally. McGill is known for its strong international reputation, and it truly lives up to that with a diverse student body from around the world, which creates an exciting, global learning environment. The academic programs are challenging and research-driven, which pushes you to think critically and manage your time effectively. I’ve particularly appreciated the interdisciplinary opportunities, allowing me to combine Political Science, International Development, and South Asian Studies, and learn from professors who are passionate leaders in their fields. Beyond the classroom, campus life is vibrant, with countless clubs, events, and networking opportunities, plus the unique experience of living in Montréal, a city that balances culture, affordability, and excitement. If there’s one area for improvement, it would be student support services. While resources are available, they can sometimes feel stretched, especially during peak academic periods, and navigating administrative processes can be challenging. Overall, I would absolutely recommend McGill to anyone looking for a rigorous education in an inspiring, multicultural setting with strong global recognition.

Université du Québec à Montréal

After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close