Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM vs Arizona Western College - AWC vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI
Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Highly competent faculty and strong academic programs
- +Commitment to social equality and support for low-income students
- +Well-respected institution with good research opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
- +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frustrating.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Overall, the university presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with its strongest areas being **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring a solid 4 out of 5. **Location** also received favorable marks. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** stand out as the weakest points, registering significantly lower scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall in the middle range, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students praise competent professionals and opportunities, while ~33% note infrastructure improvements needed.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show