Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM vs Arizona Western College - AWC vs University of Sumatera Utara vs Medan Area University - UMA vs Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI

Side-by-side comparison from 7 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: STMIK Triguna Dharma (5.00)
Universidade Federal do Amazonas - UFAM: wins 0/7 categories
Arizona Western College - AWC: wins 0/7 categories
University of Sumatera Utara: wins 0/7 categories
Medan Area University - UMA: wins 0/7 categories
Universitas Prima Indonesia - UNPRI: wins 0/7 categories
IBBI University: wins 0/7 categories
STMIK Triguna Dharma: wins 7/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Health Sciences/Medicine
Yuma, Arizona, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
medan, Indonesia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Systems
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.50
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
2.00
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Student life
3.00
Not rated
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
3.00
Not rated
3.33
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
2.50
Not rated
3.67
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly competent faculty and strong academic programs
  • +Commitment to social equality and support for low-income students
  • +Well-respected institution with good research opportunities

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive environment for diverse student aspirations
  • +Practical learning approach blending theory and case studies
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Experiential learning through internships and industry partnerships.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary obstacles.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frustrating.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -Students often express dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from instructors are common complaints.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with its strongest areas being **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring a solid 4 out of 5. **Location** also received favorable marks. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** stand out as the weakest points, registering significantly lower scores. **Student Life** and **Value** fall in the middle range, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

This university achieves its highest marks in Location and Student Life, both scoring 4.67. Facilities, Professors, and Value are rated moderately at 3.33, with Accommodations slightly better at 3.67. The weakest area is Internationality, receiving a score of 3.00, indicating room for improvement in that domain.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Exceptional marks were awarded across the board, indicating a consistently strong performance in all surveyed areas. Every category, from facilities and professors to student life and value, received a perfect score of 5. With such uniformly high ratings, there are no discernible weakest areas; the institution excels in all aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students praise competent professionals and opportunities, while ~33% note infrastructure improvements needed.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from 3 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~67%). Students highlight supportive environments and effective learning strategies combining theory and practical application. No negative reviews were submitted.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. The student highlights strong internship opportunities and beneficial industry collaboration for career development.

Rating distribution
5★
33%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
100%
4★
33%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close