Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais - UFMG vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto
Side-by-side comparison from 215 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Dedicated faculty and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and career opportunities
- +Well-maintained infrastructure and campus life
- +International environment and diverse student community
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world business application
- +Extensive international exposure and global campus options
- +High-quality teaching and dedicated professors
- +Excellent preparation for the job market
- +Strong academic and research focus
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
- +Good research and outreach programs
Nothing to show
- +High-quality professors with market experience
- +Excellent infrastructure and facilities
- +Practical, hands-on programs preparing for the market
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered by some students.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication, exam, and results management.
- -Concerns about teaching faculty and a perception of education being treated as a business.
- -Lack of student guidance and support for career goals.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are prevalent concerns.
- -Instruction quality and course content are frequently cited as disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging and irrelevant.
Exceptional ratings for **Facilities** and **Location** highlight key strengths, both scoring 4.625. **Professors** also received a strong 4.5. **Student Life** and **Internationality** are well-regarded at 4.429 and 4.25 respectively. **Accomodation**, while still a positive score at 4.143, represents the area with the lowest rating among the surveyed categories. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance with these metrics.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Strengths lie in **Internationality**, rated highest at 4.44, followed closely by **Professors** (4.38) and **Location** (4.33). **Facilities** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.25) also received strong scores. The primary area for improvement is **Accomodation**, with the lowest rating of 3.70. **Value** sits at a respectable 4.10.
Perceptions of this institution reveal a strong emphasis on its **location** and **value**, both scoring exceptionally high. Student life and internationality also receive positive, though slightly lower, marks. The weakest areas appear to be **accommodation** and **facilities**, which, while still rated above average, are the lowest-scoring aspects in this evaluation. Professors and overall facilities also received solid scores.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas. It achieves a perfect 5 out of 5 for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, indicating outstanding strengths in these domains. Location, Accomodation, and Internationality also score very well at 4.8, representing areas of solid performance without any significant weaknesses.
With an average rating of 4.33/5, approximately 88% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent professors, a complete curriculum, and strong market preparation. No negative feedback was provided.
With a 4.37 average rating from 179 reviews, approximately 90% are positive, highlighting a rewarding and transformative experience with academic knowledge, practical learning, and international exposure. A small percentage (~2.2%) of negative feedback cited management issues and poor communication.
With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 10 reviews, ~80% are positive. Students praise teaching quality, dedicated professors, and excellent facilities. A few mentioned a need for more professional education alongside academic focus.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.
Nothing to show
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight high-quality professors, practical education, and excellent campus infrastructure, including labs and libraries.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
