Lund University vs University of Gothenburg vs Umea University - UMU vs Jönköping University - JU vs Stockholm Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 72 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lund University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Gothenburg: wins 0/7 categories
Umea University - UMU: wins 2/7 categories
Jönköping University - JU: wins 0/7 categories
Stockholm Business School: wins 4/7 categories
Dalarna University: wins 0/7 categories
Stockholm School of Economics - SSE: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Lund, Sweden
4.40
Read more reviews
46 reviews
×
Best programme: Media and Communication
Best programme: AI and Data Management
Best programme: Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Business Administration and Political Science
Category ratings
Facilities
4.28
4.71
4.67
4.00
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Location
4.31
4.86
4.00
3.89
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Professors
4.23
4.57
4.33
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.37
4.71
4.67
4.20
5.00
Win
2.00
Not rated
Student life
4.45
4.00
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Value
4.20
4.29
4.67
Win
4.10
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
4.01
Win
2.86
3.67
3.40
3.00
3.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality education and expert faculty
  • +Vibrant student life and diverse community
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Well-equipped research environments and facilities
  • +Interesting and well-organized programs
  • +Excellent teachers and engaging student life.
  • +Pleasant and convenient location and facilities.
  • +Positive international atmosphere and good university reputation.
  • +International and diverse student body
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
  • +Supportive environment with inspiring teachers
  • +Excellent teaching quality and global student community
  • +Broadened horizons and expanded knowledge in business and political science
  • +Abundant working opportunities to offset living costs

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Discrimination and lack of opportunities post-graduation.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and organizational issues from the administration frustrate students.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often seen as inadequate or uninspiring.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor resources detract from learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a problem.
  • -Poor academic quality and unhelpful faculty.
  • -High tuition costs are not justified by the educational experience.
  • -Significant challenges with job prospects and societal inclusion for immigrants due to racism.
  • -administrative & management issues
  • -outdated facilities
  • -lack of engagement

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student life emerges as the university's strongest area, boasting the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like location, internationality, and facilities also scored well, with professors and value demonstrating solid, albeit slightly lower, marks.

This institution garners exceptional marks for its location, boasting a rating of 4.86. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.71. Professors receive a solid 4.57, and the overall value is rated at 4.29. Student life scores a respectable 4. The weakest area by a significant margin is accommodation, with a score of just 2.86.

This institution garners exceptionally high marks for its Facilities, Student Life, Internationality, and perceived Value, all receiving a near-perfect score. Professors are also rated favorably, while Location scores a solid 4. The primary area for improvement seems to be Accomodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.

This institution generally receives positive feedback, with particular strengths in **internationality (4.2)**, **value (4.1)**, and **professors (4)**, alongside excellent **facilities** and **student life**. Accommodation is the comparatively weakest area, scoring **3.4**. The location also received a slightly lower, though still respectable, rating.

This institution shines with perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, and Internationality. Student Life also receives a strong endorsement. However, Accomodation and Value for money present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings compared to other aspects of the university experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.41 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, praising high-level education, great student life, and community. A very small amount of negative feedback mentioned racism and time/money waste.

With a 4.71/5 average rating from 7 reviews, students report overwhelmingly positive experiences, highlighting exceptional faculty and enriching academic environments. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4.67/5, all three student reviews were positive. Recurring themes highlighted good teachers, great student life, and convenient facilities. No negative feedback was provided.

With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a highly international environment, practical learning, and student life. One ~7% review found the study difficulty low.

This university garners a 4/5 average rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students praise exceptional teaching quality and opportunities for personal and academic growth.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
54%
71%
67%
36%
0%
0%
0%
4★
35%
29%
33%
57%
100%
0%
0%
3★
9%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great university, but not so inclusive

The university is beautiful, there is no doubt about that. Although it is one of the most multicultural campuses in the world, the course I took was not inclusive for foreign students. The course was advertised as a course designed specifically for foreigners, with classes in English. In practice, many of the classes on the syllabus were actually in Swedish, and the ones that were in English gave exercises or texts in Swedish. I even had a disagreement with one of the professors who, although he was teaching a class that was supposed to be entirely in English, brought slides in Swedish and spoke exclusively in Swedish. When I asked during the break if the class shouldn't be in English, he ridiculed me in front of the class and said that if I was uncomfortable, I should have said so beforehand. The universitys advisors were very understanding, but in the end, I had to give up many of the assigned subjects and replace them with subjects that had nothing to do with my field, just because they were, in fact, taught in English.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close