Riga Technical University - RTU vs RISEBA University vs Turiba University vs EKA University of Applied Sciences vs Ventspils University of Applied Sciences - VUAS
Side-by-side comparison from 40 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, modern, and applied engineering programmes
- +Clear teaching and well-organized curriculum
- +Excellent professors and modern facilities
- +Flexible study schedules and international opportunities
- +Interactive learning with dedicated and supportive professors
- +Good facilities and English-taught programs
- +Quality of education and engaging courses
- +Convenient and pleasant campus environment
- +Well-organized educational process
- +Affordable European study opportunities
- +Insight into European institutions
- +Impactful facilitator support
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and approachable professors with real-world experience.
- +Affordable and comfortable study environment with accessible learning resources.
- +Practical and versatile study programs with internship opportunities.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Poor communication and lack of support
- -Frequent price increases for dorms
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Poor teaching quality and unclear academic expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of career support and unclear future prospects are disappointing.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support is prevalent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or not effectively delivered.
Considering the provided ratings, the university excels in its **Location**, achieving the highest score. **Student Life** and **Professors** also received strong, consistent marks. The area requiring the most attention is **Accomodation**, which has the lowest rating. Other categories like Facilities, Internationality, and Value are all rated positively, demonstrating a well-rounded educational experience.
Across several key metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all received a perfect score of five. The only area not reaching the highest mark was accommodation, rated at a still solid four. Overall, the university offers a highly positive experience with excellent value for its students.
Receiving top marks across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strength in every evaluated area. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. There are no discernible weak areas based on these ratings, indicating a consistently outstanding experience for students.
This institution garners strong marks for its **Facilities** and **Professors**, both receiving a 4 out of 5. Areas for improvement are evident in **Student Life**, which received a lower score of 2, and **Value**, rated at 2.5. The **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3.5, while **Accomodation** also scores a respectable 3.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a strong showing in its facilities and location, both receiving high marks. Student life and accommodation also stand out with solid scores. However, the university's internationality is its lowest-rated aspect, and professor ratings are also mid-range, suggesting areas for potential improvement. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with some distinct strengths and a notable area for development.
~74% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, modern facilities, and experienced professors. A small amount of negative feedback (approximately 3.9%) mentions slow administrative responses and high dorm prices.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise the good teaching level, professor support, and international opportunities. Programs taught in English and interactive learning environments are also highlighted.
With a 5/5 average rating from one review, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. This feedback highlights a pleasant campus, organized education, and satisfying quality of knowledge.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights affordability and learning about European institutions. Negative feedback is minimal, representing ~0% of reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students praise the supportive, approachable faculty and friendly, affordable environment. Recurring themes include quality programs, particularly in pedagogy, and practical learning experiences. Some minor administrative delays were noted.
My opinion of RTU is good. There is definitely a lot of room for improvement with the organization and the overall work completed with the staff. The university offers a good environment with diversity and an inviting campus.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The easiest way to begin with Europe Pretty cheap to study and possible to know more about the European institutions I d strictly recomend it to all the EU newcomers Facilitators are really about to give some Impact to students
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
