ESSEC Business School vs Technical University of Kenya vs University of Benin vs Cadi Ayyad University Marrakesh vs FST Marrakech
Side-by-side comparison from 280 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, knowledgeable professors
- +Strong academic rigor and valuable skill development
- +Welcoming environment with good campus facilities and opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on technical education
- +Quality of lecturers and specialized equipment
- +Strong industry integration and career preparation
- +Supportive learning environment and dedicated, knowledgeable lecturers
- +Opportunities for personal growth and real-world preparation
- +High academic standards and vibrant campus life
- +Supportive & approachable professors
- +Wide range of academic programs & specializations
- +Calm, focused academic environment with practical learning
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, practical instruction with professional instructors
- +Modern facilities and a vibrant multicultural environment
- +Valuable career preparation through projects, internships, and international programs
- -Administrative and management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and poor accommodation are common complaints.
- -Location is inconvenient and perceived as unsafe at night.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Facilities are not universally well-equipped for all courses.
- -Lack of recommendation for the university overall.
- -Administrative and management issues make processes difficult.
- -Facilities and infrastructure are outdated and inadequate.
- -Some lecturers do not cover the syllabus, and teaching methods are analog.
- -Outdated and poor-quality facilities are a significant drawback.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unreliable instructors are frustrating.
- -Lack of new hires and outdated faculty negatively impacts the student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient resources lead to a poor learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern equipment hinder educational progress.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and poor communication create frustration.
This university receives commendable feedback, with Internationality standing out as its strongest aspect, achieving a high rating. Student Life and Value also perform very well, indicating a positive experience and good return on investment for students. Conversely, Location and Accommodation are areas where the university is rated less favorably, suggesting potential for improvement in these particular domains.
This university garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably location (4.36) and professors (4.33). Value for money also scores highly at 4.27. The institution's weakest points appear to be accommodation (3.31) and student life (3.76). Internationality sits in the middle ground at 3.83.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with its **Location** and **Value** receiving the highest marks, both scoring nearly 4.0. Student life is also highly regarded. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accommodations** represent the weakest areas, with scores in the low 3.0s, indicating room for improvement in these aspects. The university also scores moderately well in Internationality and Professors.
This institution demonstrates a mixed performance across various aspects. Location stands out as a strength, receiving a strong rating of 4. Conversely, facilities represent the weakest area, scoring a 3. Other categories, including professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, fall within a moderate range, suggesting areas for potential improvement alongside recognized strengths.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
When examining this university's performance, notable strengths emerge in the **professors** and **accommodation** categories, both receiving a high score of 4. However, **facilities** and **internationality** present areas for improvement, scoring a lower 2. The university offers a moderate experience in terms of **location** and **student life**, with a value rating of 4 suggesting good return on investment.
With a 4.45 average rating from 49 reviews, ~94% of feedback is positive, praising knowledgeable professors, excellent financial support, and enriching academic environments. A small portion (~2%) noted location and accommodation concerns.
With an average rating of 4.23/5 from 30 reviews, approximately 97% are positive. Students praise practical learning, technical programs, and experienced faculty. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with specific course equipment and administrative helpfulness.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting cohesive technology, high academic standards, and supportive learning environments. Limited negative feedback touches on administrative difficulties and infrastructure.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable professors, a calm academic environment, and practical learning opportunities. A small portion of feedback, about 11.1%, notes occasional teacher unreliability and poor facilities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university has a single review with a perfect 5/5 rating. The positive feedback highlights a great learning environment, modern facilities, and excellent instructors. Group projects, internships, and exchange programs are also noted as strengths.
Essec BBA is a well known program if you want to attend a business school. The teaching is qualitative as the teachers usually are reputed experts in their fields. As far as it concerns the campus, you cannot complain about the diversity and quality of high tech equipment or the comfortable auditoriums. Pretty much everything is made for you to feel at ease and evolve as an ESSEC student. One of the rare things I could point out is the school campus location which is pretty much isolated and a bit far from the centre of Paris, otherwise, you can take public transport, easy to use and practical for your everyday student life.
My experience at the Technical University of Kenya was largely positive. The university offers a hands-on approach to learning, especially in technical and engineering programmes, which helped me build practical skills that I continue to use in my career. The curriculum is well-structured and industry-oriented, and most lecturers are knowledgeable and supportive. The location in the heart of Nairobi is a big plus—easy access to internships, job opportunities, and professional networking events. The university also encourages innovation and project-based learning, which makes the learning experience more dynamic. However, some areas need improvement. Administrative processes can be slow, and facilities like labs or libraries may not always be up to standard or well-equipped. Internet access on campus was also inconsistent at times. Overall, I would recommend TUK to students who are looking for a solid technical education with a practical focus. It's a good option for students who are self-driven and can make the most out of the available resources.
The University of Benin is a stellar institution that gathers great minds from all backgrounds and fields of life. What resonates with me the most about my alma mater is that the environment spurs learning and promotes healthy competition among students. I didn’t like the incessant strikes while I was a student. They distorted academic activities and made learning rushed after it ended. I recommend UNIBEN as it is an environment that is safe, non-discriminatory and fosters learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
