University of Ghana - UG vs Central University vs University of Professional Studies Accra - UPSA vs Accra Technical University vs University of Media Arts and Communications - Unimac
Side-by-side comparison from 340 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programs and theory-practice balance
- +Diverse, inclusive, and intellectually engaging campus environment
- +Opportunities for exploration and personal growth
- +Practical, relevant programmes with industry insights
- +Approachable, friendly, and dedicated lecturers
- +Supportive, quiet, and enabling learning environment
- +Academic quality and professional development
- +Supportive staff and student relationships
- +Structured curriculum and resources
- +Strong focus on practical learning and job market preparation
- +Approachable and supportive lecturers
- +Encourages leadership and professional growth
- +Practical skills integrated with theory
- +Real-world exposure and hands-on experience
- +Career path development and professional skill improvement
- +Supportive and effective lecturers
- +Good facilities
- +Well-equipped infrastructure and stimulating academic environment
- +Academically sound programs
- -Outdated curriculum and teaching methods hinder skill development.
- -Inefficient administrative processes cause communication and access issues.
- -Overcrowded facilities and old-fashioned learning environments are problematic.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
- -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as irrelevant or ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology create a poor learning environment.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders student success.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -Students often express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant concern.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and course content disappoints.
Overall, the university receives positive feedback, with particularly strong ratings in Location (4.32), Student Life (4.29), and Value (4.22). Professors (4.25) and Internationality (4.08) also score well. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, receiving a rating of 3.48, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Facilities also received a solid, but lower, score of 4.
Overall, this university presents a strong profile. Its highest-rated area is **Internationality** at 4.375, demonstrating a significant global presence. **Professors** also receive a commendable score of 4. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** emerge as the weakest points, both scoring 3.375. **Location** and **Student Life** are well-regarded, tied at 3.875, while **Value** sits at a solid 3.75.
With an impressive location rating, this institution excels in student life and value. However, accommodation appears to be the lowest-scoring area. Facilities and professors also received strong marks, while internationality fell in the mid-range.
A review of university ratings reveals a strong performance in value and professor quality, with scores of 4.41 and 4.36 respectively. Student life and internationality also received high marks, both at 3.95. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3.24, followed by facilities at 3.67. The location received a respectable 3.82 rating.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a mixed performance. The institution excels in its **Professors (4.4)** and **Value (4)**, indicating strong academic quality and affordability. Conversely, **Accomodation (1.8)** presents a significant weakness, alongside a lower score for **Internationality (2.6)**. Other areas like Facilities, Location, and Student Life fall within a moderate range.
This institution shines with an exceptional rating for its professors, indicating a high quality of instruction. Facilities and student life also receive strong scores, suggesting a supportive and engaging environment. Conversely, the university's location presents a notable weakness, receiving a low score. Accommodation and internationality are rated moderately, offering a middle ground. Overall, the value proposition appears positive, as reflected in its solid rating.
This institution excels in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors and internationality, as well as a strong rating for value. However, student life is a significant area requiring improvement, as indicated by a rating of zero. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately well, with location also falling into this average category.
Most reviews (~88%) highlight academic excellence, diverse programs, and vibrant campus life. A small minority (~1.6%) experienced administrative delays and outdated teaching methods.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 10 reviews, ~70% of feedback is positive. Students praise a blend of theory and practice in programs, approachable lecturers, and a conducive learning environment. No negative feedback was provided.
University of Professional Studies reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~87%), praising academic discipline, research, and student engagement. Students highlight professional development, excellent lecturers, and good student-teacher relationships. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.36/5 from 22 reviews, approximately 91% highlight hands-on learning and supportive lecturers. A few mention limited practical facilities or a desire for more programs. No negative feedback was recorded.
Most feedback is positive (~80%), highlighting strong career path development and a blend of theoretical and practical learning. A small portion (~20%) of reviews noted limited on-campus practical opportunities.
The single review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback suggests excellent lecturers and good facilities, though customer service could be improved.
The university is highly rated, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students describe it as well-rounded and academically stimulating, with good infrastructure.
The University of Ghana is a highly respected institution with strong research, diverse programs, and a vibrant campus life, though it faces challenges with large class sizes and administrative delays, and I would recommend it for its academic reputation and opportunities.
My honest opinion about central university I will say conducive atmosphere for studying. What I didn’t like I will say is lecturers do not pay much attention to students' reports (exams papers and end of semester results ), you will have to go to hell and back before you will finally get what has to be worked on done. I will suggest they pay more attention to students' needs. In all my stay at Central University was a good one.
UPSA is a beautiful school which nurtures and shape you for the future. I was there from 2015 to 2019 and I do not regret my decision to enroll there. Even though the campus wasn't spacious enough, building structures were strategically positioned creating free and easy movement. They have a flat of four storeys dedicated for a library with a vast array of books - well labelled according to discipline. The best part is, the library operated 24 hours a day. When it comes to teaching and learning, the university boasts of highly qualified lecturers and spacious lecture halls. In terms of security on campus, they are top notch. The campus is always lit with security men patrolling the campus. What I didn't like when I was there is, even though I was an evening student, during exams they combined both regular students and evening student and I struggled because I worked while schooling.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
