United International Business Schools - UIBS vs Università degli Studi di Trieste vs University of Pavia - UNIPV vs Ca' Foscari University Of Venice vs International School for Advanced Studies SISSA

Side-by-side comparison from 121 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP (5.00)
United International Business Schools - UIBS: wins 0/5 categories
Università degli Studi di Trieste: wins 0/5 categories
University of Pavia - UNIPV: wins 0/5 categories
Ca' Foscari University Of Venice: wins 0/5 categories
International School for Advanced Studies SISSA: wins 0/5 categories
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University - UniSR: wins 0/5 categories
International Centre for Theoretical Physics - ICTP: wins 5/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Management Information Systems
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Social Sciences
Best programme: Economics and Business
Best programme: Fisioterapia
Best programme: Theoretical Physics and Astrophysics
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.17
3.92
3.66
Not rated
4.57
5.00
Win
Location
4.75
5.00
4.23
4.12
Not rated
4.29
5.00
Professors
4.75
4.17
4.14
4.13
Not rated
4.86
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.50
4.17
4.22
4.21
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Student life
4.25
4.00
4.06
3.85
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
Value
4.50
4.67
4.14
4.16
Not rated
5.00
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
4.00
3.78
3.14
Not rated
4.17
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and helpful faculty
  • +Positive and enriching learning experience
  • +Safe and well-equipped campus
  • +Helpful professors and good academic quality
  • +Supportive environment with career opportunities and financial aid
  • +Positive study environment and engaging city life
  • +Engaging and experienced faculty
  • +Diverse and supportive student community
  • +Well-structured and effective academic programs
  • +Interdisciplinary, multi-angle approach to complex global issues
  • +Real-world problem focus with scientific analysis tools
  • +Unique city integration and international cohort experience

Nothing to show

  • +Integrated academic, clinical, and research environment
  • +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, available instructors
  • +Excellent preparation, rich internships, and modern facilities
  • +High-quality teaching and research
  • +Focus on diversity and international culture
  • +Valuable student support services
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were a common complaint.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hindered learning.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt university life.
  • -Poor course structure and insufficient depth in subject matter are disappointing.
  • -Lack of responsiveness from staff and inadequate problem resolution are recurring complaints.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

Academic and environmental aspects of the university are highly regarded, with professors and location both receiving a near-perfect score of 4.75. Student life is also a positive, scoring 4.25, and internationality and value are strong at 4.5. Facilities and accommodation present the weakest areas, both rated at 4.

This institution scores exceptionally well in location, earning a perfect 5. Value is also a significant strength, rated at 4.67. Areas of strong performance include facilities, professors, and internationality, all receiving 4.17. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4. The university presents a well-rounded academic and living experience.

This university demonstrates a strong overall performance, with particular commendations for its Location, Internationality, and Professors, all scoring above 4.1. Student Life and Value also receive favorable ratings. The areas that received the lowest scores are Accomodation and Facilities, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This university demonstrates particular strength in its internationality, receiving a rating of 4.21. Other highly-rated aspects include professors and location, both scoring above 4.12. Student life and value for money also perform well. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.14. Facilities are rated moderately at 3.66.

Nothing to show

This institution receives outstanding marks, particularly for its **professors** and **value**, which are rated exceptionally high. The **facilities** and **student life** are also strong points. While **accommodation** and **location** are rated slightly lower, they remain positive. The university demonstrates good **internationality**, contributing to a well-rounded experience.

This institution achieves a perfect score of 5 across all evaluated aspects. The university excels uniformly in its facilities, the quality of its professors, desirable location, vibrant student life, accommodation offerings, international outlook, and overall value. No specific areas emerge as stronger or weaker, as all categories demonstrate an outstanding performance.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive learning environment and helpful, passionate faculty. One review mentioned slow administrative services.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.13/5. Students highlight strong academic preparation, helpful professors, and good international exchange opportunities. Financial support and a nice study environment are also recurring themes.

University of Pavia reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~81% of feedback rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the exceptional learning environment, passionate instructors, and supportive, diverse community. No negative reviews were recorded.

~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting interdisciplinary approaches and real-world relevance. A small percentage of feedback (~16%) mentions issues with organization and professor responsiveness.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students frequently highlight the strong integration of campus, hospital, and research, along with high-quality teaching and valuable internship opportunities.

With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. This overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100%) highlights productive and interesting experiences due to high-quality teaching, research, and promotion of diversity.

Rating distribution
5★
75%
13%
36%
48%
0%
86%
100%
4★
0%
88%
41%
26%
0%
14%
0%
3★
25%
0%
23%
19%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Proud Step Toward My Academic Dream in Venice

As a former student of the Master’s program in Environmental Sciences – Global Change and Sustainability, I can confidently say that my time at Ca’ Foscari University of Venice was one of the most meaningful and transformative experiences of my life. From the very beginning, the university maintained a high level of professionalism and clarity in its communication and academic processes. As an international student, I felt well-informed about enrolment procedures, visa requirements, and academic expectations. The guidance provided made what could have been an overwhelming transition feel structured and manageable. Academically, the program was both challenging and inspiring. The curriculum was well-designed, fully taught in English, and focused on global environmental issues with a strong sustainability perspective. The professors were knowledgeable, supportive, and encouraged critical thinking and research-based learning. The international classroom environment also allowed me to engage with students from diverse cultural and academic backgrounds, which greatly enriched my experience. Beyond academics, studying in Venice added a unique dimension to my journey. The university offered helpful support services, orientation programs, and assistance with accommodation, which made settling into a new country much easier. Looking back, my time at Ca’ Foscari not only strengthened my academic foundation but also helped me grow personally and professionally. I am truly grateful for the opportunity and would highly recommend this program to anyone passionate about environmental studies and global sustainability.

Nothing to show

A place for opportunities!

I completed both my Bachelor’s (Triennale) and Master’s (Magistrale) degrees in Biotechnology. Being in a small class was really helpful. It made communication between students and professors much easier. Also, the program offers a one-year internship packed with opportunities! .

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close