SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School vs ESSCA School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 255 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging curriculum and exceptional teaching quality
- +International opportunities and diverse student body
- +Practical learning and active campus life
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant coursework
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Strong international environment and opportunities
- +Supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Vibrant student life and diverse activities
- +Practical, real-world focused education and international opportunities
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Passionate professors and diverse programs
- +International environment and collaboration opportunities
- +Strong academic foundation and well-structured courses
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result management.
- -Lack of student support and guidance for career development.
- -Concerns about faculty professionalism and a perceived focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Students often feel there is a lack of adequate support and communication.
- -Irrelevant and outdated courses and teachers
- -Poor value for money
- -Lack of student engagement and motivation
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
This institution generally receives positive evaluations, with professors earning the highest marks at 4.40. Other strong areas include internationality (4.37) and location (4.23). Student life and facilities also score well, above 4.0. The weakest area is accommodation, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.56. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across most aspects of the student experience.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives high marks for its **Internationality**, scoring a notable 4.57. Student life also garners significant praise, with a rating of 4.37. On the other hand, **Accommodations** present an area for improvement, receiving the lowest score at 3.75. Ratings for facilities, professors, location, and value are all solid, generally falling between 4.03 and 4.30, indicating a generally positive but varied experience for students.
Perceived strengths of the university lie prominently in its location and student life, both scoring above 4.2. Professors also received a strong rating. The weakest areas identified were facilities and accommodation, with scores below 3.8. Internationality and value for money were rated moderately well, falling between 3.8 and 4.
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback. The standout strengths are clearly **Internationality (4.6)** and **Student Life (4.2)**, suggesting a vibrant and globally connected campus. Conversely, **Professors (3.6)** and **Accomodation (3.6)** represent areas that are solid but could potentially benefit from improvement to match the higher scores in other aspects. The remaining categories of Facilities, Location, and Value all fall within a respectable 3.8 range.
With a 4.35/5 average from 140 reviews, ~93% praise excellent academics, international mobility, and student life. A small ~3% of feedback noted issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
All 28 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students frequently highlight the international environment, dynamic academic approach, and supportive faculty.
Around 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful staff, engaging classes, and enjoyable campus life. A small portion (~6%) expressed dissatisfaction with course relevance and teaching staff.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
With a 3.6/5 average rating, reviews highlight strong academic foundations, knowledgeable professors, and diverse, stimulating programs. A recurring theme is the desire for more practical application and hands-on experience. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
My experience at Université Paris Cité has been deeply enriching, particularly due to the dynamic international environment that this university fosters. The biomedical engineering program not only offers a rigorous and well-rounded curriculum but also provides an incredible opportunity to collaborate with students and faculty from across the globe. This diversity creates a unique space for learning, where ideas and perspectives merge, offering invaluable insights into the global challenges in healthcare. One of the highlights has been the program's commitment to encouraging exchange between students with diverse educational and cultural backgrounds. Engaging with peers from different parts of the world has enhanced my understanding of how biomedical engineering innovations can be applied in varied contexts to address critical health issues. This collaborative approach inspires a greater sense of purpose, motivating us all toward the shared goal of advancing human health. The university’s emphasis on real-world applications and research-driven projects is another standout aspect. Whether it’s through group discussions, lab work, or research projects, the program continually promotes active learning and problem-solving in a way that prepares students for the global landscape of biomedical research and healthcare. I would highly recommend Université Paris Cité to anyone looking for a program that combines academic rigor with an open, globally-minded perspective. For students passionate about biomedical engineering, it is an ideal environment to connect with like-minded individuals and work collectively toward impactful solutions in healthcare.
