SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 240 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging curriculum and exceptional teaching quality
- +International opportunities and diverse student body
- +Practical learning and active campus life
- +Rigorous academic and practical preparation for careers
- +Strong alumni network and career services support
- +International exposure and diverse student body
- +Supportive and approachable lecturers
- +Well-organized courses and learning resources
- +Personal and academic development
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
- +Engaging, practical, and relevant coursework
- +Supportive and approachable faculty
- +Strong international environment and opportunities
- +Market-relevant skills leading to career advancement
- +High-quality, competent faculty and engaging learning experiences
- +Supportive and friendly community atmosphere
- +Passionate professors and diverse programs
- +International environment and collaboration opportunities
- +Strong academic foundation and well-structured courses
- -Administrative & management issues, including poor communication and exam/result management.
- -Lack of student support and guidance for career development.
- -Concerns about faculty professionalism and a perceived focus on profit over education.
- -High tuition fees and perceived low return on investment.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited as a source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
- -Students often feel there is a lack of adequate support and communication.
- -Inconsistent and unreliable administrative and management issues
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities and resources
- -Lack of effective communication and support from faculty and staff
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of resources and support
This institution generally receives positive evaluations, with professors earning the highest marks at 4.40. Other strong areas include internationality (4.37) and location (4.23). Student life and facilities also score well, above 4.0. The weakest area is accommodation, which received a significantly lower rating of 3.56. Overall, the university demonstrates a solid reputation across most aspects of the student experience.
Academic and student experience aspects generally receive positive marks, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.41. Professors and Facilities are also highly rated. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area at 3.14, indicating room for improvement in this regard. Location and Student Life are moderately rated, suggesting a solid but not exceptional experience in those domains.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across multiple aspects. The highest-rated areas are Professors (4.75) and Location (4.73), indicating significant strengths in these domains. Conversely, Facilities (4.3) and Accomodation (4.27) received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for potential improvement. Student Life and Internationality also scored highly.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
This institution receives high marks for its **Internationality**, scoring a notable 4.57. Student life also garners significant praise, with a rating of 4.37. On the other hand, **Accommodations** present an area for improvement, receiving the lowest score at 3.75. Ratings for facilities, professors, location, and value are all solid, generally falling between 4.03 and 4.30, indicating a generally positive but varied experience for students.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its faculty and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.8. Facilities and location also received high marks at 4.5. Student life and perceived value are positive at 4.25 and 4.2 respectively. The primary area for improvement, however, lies in accommodation, which received the lowest rating of 3.67.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback. The standout strengths are clearly **Internationality (4.6)** and **Student Life (4.2)**, suggesting a vibrant and globally connected campus. Conversely, **Professors (3.6)** and **Accomodation (3.6)** represent areas that are solid but could potentially benefit from improvement to match the higher scores in other aspects. The remaining categories of Facilities, Location, and Value all fall within a respectable 3.8 range.
With a 4.35/5 average from 140 reviews, ~93% praise excellent academics, international mobility, and student life. A small ~3% of feedback noted issues with management, communication, and program organization.
With a 4.24/5 average, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting intense courses, strong alumni networks, and excellent career services. A small percentage of feedback mentioned high tuition fees.
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), highlighting excellent teaching, supportive staff, and well-organized courses that improve language and academic skills. Minor scheduling changes were the only noted inconvenience.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
All 28 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students frequently highlight the international environment, dynamic academic approach, and supportive faculty.
All 5 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.4/5. Students highlight career advancements and valuable market skills gained. They also praise high-quality courses, competent professors, and engaging events.
With a 3.6/5 average rating, reviews highlight strong academic foundations, knowledgeable professors, and diverse, stimulating programs. A recurring theme is the desire for more practical application and hands-on experience. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My experience at Université Paris Cité has been deeply enriching, particularly due to the dynamic international environment that this university fosters. The biomedical engineering program not only offers a rigorous and well-rounded curriculum but also provides an incredible opportunity to collaborate with students and faculty from across the globe. This diversity creates a unique space for learning, where ideas and perspectives merge, offering invaluable insights into the global challenges in healthcare. One of the highlights has been the program's commitment to encouraging exchange between students with diverse educational and cultural backgrounds. Engaging with peers from different parts of the world has enhanced my understanding of how biomedical engineering innovations can be applied in varied contexts to address critical health issues. This collaborative approach inspires a greater sense of purpose, motivating us all toward the shared goal of advancing human health. The university’s emphasis on real-world applications and research-driven projects is another standout aspect. Whether it’s through group discussions, lab work, or research projects, the program continually promotes active learning and problem-solving in a way that prepares students for the global landscape of biomedical research and healthcare. I would highly recommend Université Paris Cité to anyone looking for a program that combines academic rigor with an open, globally-minded perspective. For students passionate about biomedical engineering, it is an ideal environment to connect with like-minded individuals and work collectively toward impactful solutions in healthcare.
